Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam-11: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke via Datatracker <> Wed, 02 June 2021 16:47 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6DE3A1191; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 09:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <>
To: The IESG <>
Cc:,,, Ole Trøan <>,
Subject: Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam-11: (with COMMENT)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.30.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Duke <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 09:47:09 -0700
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 16:47:09 -0000

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to
for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Thank you for addressing the TSVART comments (and to Magnus for the review) and

I see that some of the contributors are in common, but this would appear to
have substantial overlap with