RE: draft-dong-6man-enhanced-vpn-vtn-id-01

Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Thu, 30 July 2020 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9923A0E57 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=Ec/CFjqd; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=Qk5oGXp3
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ErgsxvY2fYs for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:12:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F03DC3A0E54 for <6man@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:12:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108156.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06UH8UCF026461; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:11:37 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=m5l9+pFDNEj2Kk+8Pohp2AIEJmv+CgsDmBEeurtLSMA=; b=Ec/CFjqdfvfqDFeRlz9yeGJnBMLZ9hBgX8dyRZ0FalXY2pWCc/k+jGmRykWPm83UPtZv QIba+I6+OndtBstfpfixXWOdxNRdB/w4HxmZX/CdLXtaf6t9QjiTsO25GCqWkX/Oa5nO F0TqhXYFCa2RSCZr8ZGAFcHupm3ygNgLLd7fNhJyVSVGhWhS7dtQmXTClyaotFGX+DHP fIzJtwyKP3NZZcGMuy/l2Yo0G++AuclGSmMopbGMZYmazyHix2xDPF6RruZDXxx4cH44 bZPjOf1PFZktynSEC1aF/DnJ/8xMWe5k37OMUycG4SxnRXL3A+ZMW8aXA6WF+WfO5Ruo LA==
Received: from nam04-co1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam04lp2053.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.45.53]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32gkrq0t0e-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:11:36 -0700
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=BA3rg6zyJ9OUEHX7KV5Tfrwlm9Vb9gKXATFoYaaFsC+Lblwi+i1xOLzZnsx8+d4OPflAH58EHqNZlAh4I3eNTdkBhILQjRBJI+KyvYNtkHVuanYDc9MT3fsz+9vw1INX1+24eWVZKFgK/3gVYuNbh0KVTkZuSoO3radMfwbC4JZ8xOzJvx8GS8qMmM5cEesanM9cRhB6xDGXIO21JyIj6Pf0Chigu1vD5DuSm3ABXaufddltWRcMXlFKqBGk3YLqyvb7P3NlukICXqM/Qda89bX2USbZqOIMhuW+DK6SVmlq3/pfClfAuoLmW37vXo8hJ7GwMhpGTtd5yIuMzY4F5A==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=m5l9+pFDNEj2Kk+8Pohp2AIEJmv+CgsDmBEeurtLSMA=; b=N4tSM/Xg/8A7nlALpWGTXYFFMehpwyNvu9yF+MvVNT9UpRhpMCJeaTv/a5AgM67Sjvo/rqRSBc6rQ9EHjxmAgQiZBxNt/cb/nGywStNkWGNDwD7EHSDt36b290KMgmSWgQGz9tHhCMHGHbDGBHCz6N+DjPGEB4Qdz+sX8TQl+A5hDxZCDjKJHaHqjqOSXw5bo9TAHyWWuF0T7dmCYiEB+HvK+xkYD3GfYGD5eCDfSnQ44gvD1qh6rE6GV6aYOFsyNtjW1C/EPBZ0seT/QeArx5Di2ALz+rnJsUyy+IX73IPiM5+5h13ZjGTcyloBotl9bIk1mvlb1ukZe06CbauPmw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=m5l9+pFDNEj2Kk+8Pohp2AIEJmv+CgsDmBEeurtLSMA=; b=Qk5oGXp376043wGXUMagJbUEfvAMn2XlK4GQ/CQTqKyu5uGzD7PzEOOQ+kKDzvZD9VbNospJz2S+RxijRWTtzw0UPUZLLczvb2ihYtP+Udc6LQI/7b5zrXb5Hamv99cctm+lFBdgsDs4FUZxWTK7gh2cQYlTYEP1u87uMwFoTc4=
Received: from DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:122::15) by DM6PR05MB5772.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:10e::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3239.11; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:11:34 +0000
Received: from DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9d38:2336:1379:ce2e]) by DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9d38:2336:1379:ce2e%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3239.020; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:11:34 +0000
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: draft-dong-6man-enhanced-vpn-vtn-id-01
Thread-Topic: draft-dong-6man-enhanced-vpn-vtn-id-01
Thread-Index: AdZlBQlO9JhlnyNeQUaR/K2vKekKjAAb4TWQAEeikQA=
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:11:34 +0000
Message-ID: <DM6PR05MB6348760B5BD1F8BA8874717EAE710@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <DM6PR05MB6348F564EE4A9470553B0A8AAE730@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <d579687dd60141b3902706539292a0c4@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <d579687dd60141b3902706539292a0c4@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2020-07-30T17:11:33Z; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=9061d3ca-a15f-4161-b280-0b5d6bae21e4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ContentBits=2
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.5.0.60
dlp-reaction: no-action
authentication-results: huawei.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;huawei.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [173.79.132.205]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 055b30e0-9784-49a1-4fc9-08d834ab9ca3
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR05MB5772:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR05MB5772EF4A262D4D1425BAFA96AE710@DM6PR05MB5772.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: NgS4sEn8hbNxZrRonH88SYWUZixHOLFNYIoLWAr/MkDsQrvOMgUZRO1wGl23sHIFwmCEIbSnsk4Mdg+wEH5Qmh3kiJXVlkUZWd1TQIFCZALTkBjHRGgXbCfCh9gK1EzW8OE/ZW5QP+3edgXD6Ox7tykFMQeACufuLXi5/oOg9q57A21B1OgcVPyoucYkZM1vF/rq+2ZkxTrlF9DXJU1iEa2CxpH2afcGEhtNfO3kUa87HpwZ4arRCmXq65an1upJd3sSE7CaA29EOzC5A9cdhrPJ4V7v7foRNhGQFcj9FT5KGbUTe1fo+UlLXsSeXOotgRlqeI/ETaE1sOwrO+K2Dae5WQIHa+HhQ8joXuHbvNTyNqqiWqsG6ulYOuxjMWUQ
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(346002)(136003)(366004)(39860400002)(396003)(376002)(66946007)(110136005)(66556008)(66476007)(6506007)(8936002)(66446008)(7696005)(316002)(76116006)(53546011)(33656002)(478600001)(55016002)(8676002)(9686003)(86362001)(64756008)(71200400001)(5660300002)(2906002)(52536014)(186003)(26005)(160933001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM6PR05MB6348760B5BD1F8BA8874717EAE710DM6PR05MB6348namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 055b30e0-9784-49a1-4fc9-08d834ab9ca3
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Jul 2020 17:11:34.3966 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: hJYrw4GolmXXhB08NXQ74KSVdiNpWYMbe6zg9jlmPwrezL83uL9GoQIWEV0zT+IE+pomar1Arn/+N0l56H+3hg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR05MB5772
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-30_13:2020-07-30, 2020-07-30 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 clxscore=1011 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2007300122
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/eXd18wXRt9gc2yKBY7KGfSUjdKc>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:12:45 -0000

Jimmy,

Please tell me if I am understanding this correctly.....

On each node, the IPv6 destination address identifies a set of virtual interfaces to the next hop. Each virtual interface:


  *   Originates on the same physical interface on the local node
  *   Terminates on the same physical interface on the next-hop node

The VTNI determines which virtual interface the packet traverses. The DSCP bits determine scheduling, queuing and drop profiles on each virtual interface.

Do I have this right?

Also, is there a bandwidth reservation associated with each virtual interface?

                                                            Ron




Juniper Business Use Only
From: Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 3:43 AM
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>; 6man@ietf.org
Subject: RE: draft-dong-6man-enhanced-vpn-vtn-id-01

[External Email. Be cautious of content]

Hi Ron,

Thanks for your review and comment.

Your interpretation is in the right direction, while the relationship between VTN-ID and DSCP could be considered as in a hierarchical manner, and each is for different purpose. VTN-ID is used to consistently identify a virtual network with a group of network resources allocated from the network, there is no priority difference between VTNs. DSCP is used to provide class (priority) based traffic differentiation, which can be used within VTN.

Hope this helps.

Best regards,
Jie

From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ron Bonica
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 1:45 AM
To: 6man@ietf.org<mailto:6man@ietf.org>
Subject: draft-dong-6man-enhanced-vpn-vtn-id-01

Co-authors,

In Section 4.2, you say:

"There can be different implementations of reserving local network
   resources to the VTNs.  On each interface, the resources allocated to
   a particular VTN can be seen as a virtual sub-interface with
   dedicated bandwidth and other associated resources.  In packet
   forwarding, the IPv6 destination address of the received packet is
   used to identify the next-hop and the outgoing interface, and the VTN
   ID is used to further identify the virtual sub-interface which is
   associated with the VTN on the outgoing interface."

I interpret this as meaning:


  *   The IPv6 destination address is solely responsible for identifying the IP next hop
  *   The VTNI, along with the DSCP bits, determine how the packet is forwarded to the next-hop

So, I can think of the VTNI as "more DSCP bits".

Do I have that right?

                                                                  Ron




Juniper Business Use Only