IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Mon, 24 June 2013 22:11 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624B921F85F7 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.68
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.68 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.213, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pxsGTBm2YUaT for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co1ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9502111E81A0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail154-co1-R.bigfish.com (10.243.78.229) by CO1EHSOBE012.bigfish.com (10.243.66.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:11:25 +0000
Received: from mail154-co1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail154-co1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3D5C603B8 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:11:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:66.129.224.50; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -1
X-BigFish: PS-1(zz1432Izz1f42h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzzz2fh2a8h683h839h944hd25hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1de9h1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail154-co1: domain of juniper.net designates 66.129.224.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.129.224.50; envelope-from=rbonica@juniper.net; helo=P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net ; -HQ.jnpr.net ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:157.56.238.5; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:BY2PRD0512HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT
Received: from mail154-co1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail154-co1 (MessageSwitch) id 1372111883373307_14204; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:11:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CO1EHSMHS027.bigfish.com (unknown [10.243.78.244]) by mail154-co1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9B12004B for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:11:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net (66.129.224.50) by CO1EHSMHS027.bigfish.com (10.243.66.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:11:22 +0000
Received: from P-CLDFE01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.59) by P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:11:21 -0700
Received: from o365mail.juniper.net (207.17.137.149) by o365mail.juniper.net (172.24.192.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.355.2; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:11:21 -0700
Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (216.32.181.185) by o365mail.juniper.net (207.17.137.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:14:39 -0700
Received: from mail13-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.235) by CH1EHSOBE011.bigfish.com (10.43.70.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:11:19 +0000
Received: from mail13-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail13-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C3510026D for <ipv6@ietf.org.FOPE.CONNECTOR.OVERRIDE>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:11:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail13-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail13-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1372111878846390_1655; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:11:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CH1EHSMHS036.bigfish.com (snatpool1.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.241]) by mail13-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BB01A004F; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:11:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BY2PRD0512HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.238.5) by CH1EHSMHS036.bigfish.com (10.43.69.245) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:11:18 +0000
Received: from BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.5.17]) by BY2PRD0512HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.243.36]) with mapi id 14.16.0324.000; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:11:17 +0000
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
Subject: RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt
Thread-Topic: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOcRsX7UHYoUo9i0CXdOQER31iGZlFV0KAgAAVfXA=
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:11:16 +0000
Message-ID: <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F8761C@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85151@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <51C32FA9.1090207@gmail.com> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85F38@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <20130624204008.GB3647@virgo.local> <20130624205226.GC3647@virgo.local>
In-Reply-To: <20130624205226.GC3647@virgo.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.232.2]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%JAUU.NET$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%GMAIL.COM$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
Cc: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:11:46 -0000

> 
> "New IPv6 host implementations MAY support IPv6 fragmentation and
> reassembly"
> break things. "New IPv6 host implementations MAY support IPv6
> fragmentation but MUST support reassembly" may superior. This will
> aging out fragmentation over a longer period, new hosts will not use it
> but existing - applications will not break.

I could live with this. Would it satisfy other folks' objections?

> 
> "Network operators MAY filter IPv6 fragments." is a policy thing and
> costumers have to deal with that already. So it is ok from my point of
> view.

Ack. It is a statement of fact, not an IETF imposed requirement.

                                 Ron

> 
> Hagen
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email