Re: Why /64

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Mon, 28 October 2013 09:57 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B93111E815A for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TYS3OQx9oKHg for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [IPv6:2001:9e0:803::6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1709911E8158 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A6524; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:57:14 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eNezMcm0k9Sj; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:57:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from macpro.10ww.steffann.nl (macpro.10ww.steffann.nl [37.77.56.75]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 902FB16; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:57:12 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1816\))
Subject: Re: Why /64
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
In-Reply-To: <3135C2851EB6764BACEF35D8B495596806FAC25ECF@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:57:12 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7DE758C2-CD72-444B-B321-4CEB2066F06D@steffann.nl>
References: <20131021224346.32495.64932.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <52695DDE.70909@gont.com.ar> <526AA24F.6010609@gmail.com> <526AACA5.7090604@si6networks.com> <E0F0D3DE-D31B-4CC2-9384-DFEBCCB8F557@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|9f43bef2fe7433173858819bd0eeee2dp9OKUJ03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|E0F0D3DE-D31B-4CC2-9384-DFEBCCB8F557@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <526AC8AF.4060608@si6networks.com> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553BA7B978@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <CAKD1Yr0q2dY041CMarFfTZZx6=qHC-eJ+74qgiHP-dt7+ga7yg@mail.gmail.com> <526CDC59.4070204@massar.ch> <526D3706.5070409@alvarezp.ods.org> <526E1F5A.2070901@massar.ch> <3135C2851EB6764BACEF35D8B495596806FAC25D4E@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> <1E6580AB-7010-4E45-8903-6126E82A9772@steffann.nl> <3135C2851EB6764BACEF35D8B495596806FAC25ECF@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com>
To: Wuyts Carl <Carl.Wuyts@technicolor.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1816)
Cc: "<ipv6@ietf.org>" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:57:39 -0000

Hi Carl,

> Don't worry, I agree upon your statements wrt size of prefix, and always recommend our customers a /56 (or bigger), and this is for residential CPE, so I'm not really talking about "home-office" networks.

Don't underestimate how many people work from home one or two days a week :-)

> Reality today however says that the majority of users today is using a single /64 which I believe makes the ISP think on the size of the ia_pd to be used, hence they might select something smaller, also to get more value in the future for using bigger ones (for more advanced users), so it's sort of a trade-off I believe.

They can get as many IPv6 addresses as they need (even if giving each customer a /48) from the RIPE NCC, so the only reason to do this is to promote more expensive subscriptions. This saddens me, but I guess they will learn when users start complaining...

> Nevertheless, /64, the topic of these mails, on links should be kept imho, so not start tweaking them smaller just because some ISPs only handout some smaller ia_pd.  Arin guidelines seems to be in place for /56, should not be a bad idea to have this being used globally, but might not be that easy to enforce.

Ack!
Sander