Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Tue, 25 June 2013 18:56 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453CB21F9C0C for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z+bBunr1VRaF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:56:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-4.cisco.com (ams-iport-4.cisco.com [144.254.224.147]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E3721F9A4B for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai4FAK7myVGQ/khM/2dsb2JhbABagwnAMoEGFnSCIwEBAQMBOj0CEAtGVwaIGwa7Eo9FB4MCYQOpB4MsIA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,938,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="14986801"
Received: from ams-core-3.cisco.com ([144.254.72.76]) by ams-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Jun 2013 18:56:45 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-61-110-64.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-110-64.cisco.com [10.61.110.64]) by ams-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r5PIudMN021238 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:56:42 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <m24ncmaozs.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:56:37 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <2EA20F89-02F5-4D06-90EE-A7D2974045A3@employees.org>
References: <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85151@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <51C32FA9.1090207@gmail.com> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85F38@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <20130624204008.GB3647@virgo.local> <20130624205226.GC3647@virgo.local> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F8761C@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <51C902DC.9000408@gmail.com> <m24ncmaozs.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:56:53 -0000

Randy,

>> If it's a statement of fact, it shouldn't use RFC 2119 language. It
>> should simply state the truth: "Network operators might filter IPv6
>> fragments."
> 
> s/might/do/

would you be able to answer why and where?

cheers,
Ole