IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Feedback on draft-gont-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-01

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Sun, 15 April 2012 03:55 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0D521F866D for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 20:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.724
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.724 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.125, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ve0WKFOm5uWB for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 20:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-4.cisco.com (mtv-iport-4.cisco.com [173.36.130.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B7021F8669 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 20:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=344; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1334462119; x=1335671719; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0vjKOI1Qu5yGAlMjbUnPkmIuh6A1yZDkdYBiggx7xpQ=; b=IpmAiB5/WdvggD0/pgfxhPY3G9hcwW91uyhOLcJFEdvLUJ7iCq0NVfzO BAzBvkQqKha4BLYMLBbwTq+SSW7xybn45q41o69QU89nc5oJ8cve4ixLy 8oxHM/p7kG1S74LpGPcWzPdJ0A5SYa5+2icWOZaoiXaL0kd4TgK9/PL9n s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAAJGik+rRDoI/2dsb2JhbABDtQuBB4IJAQEBAwESASc/BQsLDjhXBjWHZwSZBp8BkGZjBIhajROFcohagWmDBw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,424,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="40511464"
Received: from mtv-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.58.8]) by mtv-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2012 03:55:19 +0000
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-218.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-218.cisco.com [10.32.244.218]) by mtv-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3F3tINq015471; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 03:55:18 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by stealth-10-32-244-218.cisco.com (PGP Universal service); Sat, 14 Apr 2012 20:55:19 -0700
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by stealth-10-32-244-218.cisco.com on Sat, 14 Apr 2012 20:55:19 -0700
Subject: Re: Feedback on draft-gont-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-01
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F8A3124.4090005@si6networks.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 20:54:53 -0700
Message-Id: <1BEEB247-8C36-4139-BF44-79E4993033E1@cisco.com>
References: <E7607B61-9889-43A9-B86B-133BD4238BA2@gmail.com> <1334276068.3945.408.camel@karl> <4F882A44.3080305@si6networks.com> <1334363774.3945.541.camel@karl> <CAAuHL_BCv2q=hDjTLmiviLoRRTbbyU+aSSQ0ETbDDQk==YfmLQ@mail.gmail.com> <C5B723A8-8A24-46BD-94E5-0BA2D8CCB460@cisco.com> <4F89DEE7.1080205@si6networks.com> <C91E67751B1EFF41B857DE2FE1F68ABA03CFD484@TK5EX14MBXC274.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <8C04B19A-6E88-4544-8827-13BB4D672CFE@cisco.com> <4F8A3124.4090005@si6networks.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com>, "ipv6@ietf.org 6man" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 03:55:20 -0000

On Apr 14, 2012, at 7:23 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:

> That said, a more general question would be: should we include the (numeric) interface index rather than e.g. a hardware-specific I-D?

Hmmm. I would tend to think that's a small positive integer, which isn't all that unique. Are you thinking of something different than I am?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email