IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD

Seiichi Kawamura <kawamucho@mesh.ad.jp> Mon, 16 May 2011 00:17 UTC

Return-Path: <kawamucho@mesh.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77DA1E06E5 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 May 2011 17:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aZSYrftzqgwu for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 May 2011 17:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp [202.32.8.206]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD5CE06D7 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 May 2011 17:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgate4.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.184]) by tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p4G0HXqR027504 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 May 2011 09:17:33 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate4.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id p4G0HXl15186 for ipv6@ietf.org; Mon, 16 May 2011 09:17:33 +0900 (JST)
Received: from bgas200085.sys.biglobe.nec.co.jp (bgas200085.sys.biglobe.nec.co.jp [10.82.141.45]) by mailsv4.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p4G0HX8c021839 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 May 2011 09:17:33 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail.sys.biglobe.nec.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bgas200085.sys.biglobe.nec.co.jp (BINGO/BINGO/06101717) with ESMTP id p4G0HX1V021519 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 May 2011 09:17:33 +0900
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.84.99.90]) (authenticated bits=0) (envelope-from kawamucho@mesh.ad.jp) by mail.sys.biglobe.nec.co.jp (BINGO/BINGO/10031711) with ESMTP id p4G0HXYo010535 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 May 2011 09:17:33 +0900
Message-ID: <4DD06D1C.8060904@mesh.ad.jp>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 09:17:32 +0900
From: Seiichi Kawamura <kawamucho@mesh.ad.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; ja; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Node Requirements: Elevating DHCPv6 from MAY to SHOULD
References: <201105131337.p4DDbdao009901@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1105131848110.20305@uplift.swm.pp.se> <20110514.012152.41686540.sthaug@nethelp.no> <4DCDBF77.90604@innovationslab.net>
In-Reply-To: <4DCDBF77.90604@innovationslab.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 00:17:36 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Just read this thread. This is so great.
Thanks to Thomas and all for the new text.

Seiichi

(2011/05/14 8:32), Brian Haberman wrote:
> All,
>      The chairs have determined that there is a strong consensus to
> elevate DHCPv6 to SHOULD support in the node requirements document.
> Since this is the last open issue with this document, the chairs will
> begin the advancement process when a new version is published.
> 
> Regards,
> Brian & Bob
> 
> On 5/13/11 7:21 PM, sthaug@nethelp.no wrote:
>>>> Per a previous thread, there are indications that the WG may now be 
>>>> willing to recommend that DHCPv6 be a SHOULD for all hosts. This is 
>>>> based on the following rationale:
>>>
>>> I support moving it to SHOULD.
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6@ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)

iEYEARECAAYFAk3QbRsACgkQcrhTYfxyMkJyZwCfYnUcMHcKh4SCkqGsNOOJ7Zgl
cyYAn0fXK5VUi+/1HxN21CDr6Tbr33i2
=hyQA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email