IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-palet-sunset4-ipv6-ready-dns-00.txt

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 25 November 2017 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C73128891; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 11:00:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9paqs2D-qo6W; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 11:00:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x244.google.com (mail-ot0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B94E1288B8; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 11:00:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x244.google.com with SMTP id s12so21163295otc.0; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 11:00:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=7FXK9Hbsy2NvXHbs21RXBKze0r25JhyaY220NVjBj5I=; b=H08aUilHx4bXp2Hh0gIcaZoj7DH4LEzaYRSrkUkaaJqq+8g9i9Eja7uui7aAOZcBPU zEqRo+Q0xKXVh0AYWwCaZWxB31HxQzhSxlkzbi6Ml1iM2hacw37UrqM1qZglp2PAd4Gg SN7HoXpsQ4XDQeJBJts3EjpcfjqrLdmz0biq8RtuB1mjeujp8XlN7x5DjVT5m8j7BbOx 6ThPnVJZ/f6hAixHRwZO4/aTJdOl/lS6aoO6M1r239okM123vyHUD01Jm+KmLiVWpjS7 UMGGw86fCqhfYTEic0BpUN0rPVpVKzbq5K50+VBi7dCt+CTL/w8Nl4ZuLYAUhWFj+pxn ht+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=7FXK9Hbsy2NvXHbs21RXBKze0r25JhyaY220NVjBj5I=; b=JNVBpkRZMeM7+lSj1Z1UEtvPAMo9vMxrwqLSEArQx35wqS9WiTEBOXDMxJXlpnGWd9 F00NCzerxoMNdKSv3TLl9BSmnmyGO76xpAcEAlI/9+RcssLWWkcU+Cgm42XuPV44Uf2P ho7S6DYkjH3m13s/6OM45SYecJ6YQ8197q+aAjLTrp3+vZa5ThPCqbkE+4EvPcrvw/fP 5iHmsV5plG33yF1vTh30vfWP7ePaGgWJSE33lcTVY5y6UdDTa7K6D53vL3afix1CxN6T 5VFbKbu0An0XCTX5TeaA06x1LEdUW6qnedPYbbEbIh30+oMo8L5uaGP3F1RLnhqVBsHh XBDQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6dd9F9DXJ96l0wOUIQXmFzDBzNupct/chou/PqSvChS+F0Veri HWzAxEXybOkRulE6jTYYWZ6aTkU/
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMap2WjSCeEO/jMKuSU/gFUaQSpFW6ZlyMVAM2Twr+rhUsBEcgT83oV89mem4er0KDiZWw7j+A==
X-Received: by 10.157.25.42 with SMTP id j42mr6903047ota.348.1511636423695; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 11:00:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5600:f7a::1019? ([2600:8802:5600:f7a::1019]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j9sm6648182oth.31.2017.11.25.11.00.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 25 Nov 2017 11:00:22 -0800 (PST)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <18C3DFC8-45B9-4C41-8151-ACA840F00518@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_560B97F8-4746-470D-A2C3-5112656EC11E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-palet-sunset4-ipv6-ready-dns-00.txt
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 11:00:19 -0800
In-Reply-To: <2E863078-8E32-4657-B1F4-0417A0C95A05@consulintel.es>
Cc: sunset4@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, 6man@ietf.org, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel@karrenberg.net>
To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
References: <151155545267.9162.17152586924934799206.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <B0A6AF83-099A-4D4D-83EB-BA4B45D00353@consulintel.es> <2E863078-8E32-4657-B1F4-0417A0C95A05@consulintel.es>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/y51JJFgj_dSHN_KZ6NKeMfeDZhU>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 19:00:28 -0000


> On Nov 24, 2017, at 12:47 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:
> 
> I’ve started also to work in a policy proposal for ICANN in order to make sure that we get aligned.

One thing you might want to think about: the root servers are all IPv6-capable today and serve requests using IPv6, and the 1541 TLDs are all required by contract with ICANN to be IPv6-capable. I think you'll find yourself holding the burden of proof that the infrastructure isn't capable of IPv6-only operation today.

RSO statistics are available from http://www.root-servers.org/. ICANN TLDs are at https://data.iana.org/TLD/tlds-alpha-by-domain.txt.

Reading through your draft, what I see that is probably not present today is an IPv6 address for every SLD, which is to say names like "example.com".

What might be worth your while (I copy Daniel because he did a similar study using RIPE Atlas not too long ago and can point you to relevant documentation on how to do one yourself) would be to set up a RIPE Atlas study that accesses the Root, ccTLD, and gTLD authoritative servers using their IPv6 addresses and reports on the status of that from a wide variety of locations.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email