Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 25 June 2013 05:17 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA2111E810B for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.58
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.58 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9DjVUIBL0wKM for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3EB11E810E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=445; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1372137455; x=1373347055; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=V33OQviyLGI7oMRKGtXYTrVzphWy1HTgECzaQuuDTOE=; b=bV5UeuTwPc1CDaCYpT47MfBDO1qjxMIfwDWdtRu/tFLuzJQanLZdDMwb gnSFGkscONdAsst9XTAQ+6Av2QHTquneHVbKt8XdCg6jql7HCo1aS1MtT nWu2URQPbR2qbhNviD8pXCeY2qEufYbSFMtADaCC3Trhq9z5MIbUPeq5o E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah4FALImyVGtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABagwl6gj68eIEDFnSCIwEBAQMBdwIFCwIBCCIkMiUCBA4FCIgABrp5jxwCMQeDAmEDiGmgHoMQgig
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,933,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="226971772"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Jun 2013 05:17:35 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com [173.36.12.76]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r5P5HZ30023874 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 25 Jun 2013 05:17:35 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.220]) by xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com ([173.36.12.76]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:17:34 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHObrhw+oeXeGk8fUGYrsNNQcu2OplEbx8AgADa9wCAAKfigIAASwEA
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 05:17:34 +0000
Message-ID: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B924D3D@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
References: <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85151@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <51C408BC.4030909@forthnetgroup.gr> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85BCB@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B921F57@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923ACA4B26@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F86EB0@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923ACA52AE@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923ACA52AE@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.125]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <4A2F9D76852180408A5BCAF93A65B885@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org 6man-wg" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 05:17:46 -0000

On Jun 24, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com> wrote:

> However, I personally think we would found deprecating fragmentation in whole IPv6 protocol might be too dramatic and had too many incompatible issues after carefully and neutral analysis.

That is consistent with my view, for reasons I have already stated.

> The deprecating proposal by itself might create more problems than it fixes.

Possibly.