RE: Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com> Mon, 03 February 2014 19:06 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358001A0162; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:06:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KxoiW_Mw9srk; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:06:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1lp0149.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.149]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FA81A01F8; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:06:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DM2PR03CA010.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.52.158) by BN1PR03MB023.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.224.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.868.8; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 19:06:11 +0000
Received: from BN1BFFO11FD032.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7c10::1:123) by DM2PR03CA010.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:2414::30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.868.8 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 19:06:10 +0000
Received: from mail.microsoft.com (131.107.125.37) by BN1BFFO11FD032.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.58.144.95) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.856.14 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 19:06:09 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC301.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.1.10]) by TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.79.180]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.002; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 19:05:15 +0000
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com>
To: "l.wood@surrey.ac.uk" <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk>, "fgont@si6networks.com" <fgont@si6networks.com>, "stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Topic: Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHPFsD+YOme/d80rkOODnhQM2zvF5qPW/6AgAAWIYCAFIVp0A==
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 19:05:15 +0000
Message-ID: <C91E67751B1EFF41B857DE2FE1F68ABA3DF99DCB@TK5EX14MBXC301.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <20140121155253.23475.70004.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>, <52DE9E63.5050404@si6networks.com> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E63346D8@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E63346D8@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.79]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.37; CTRY:US; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009001)(6009001)(189002)(199002)(93516002)(93136001)(6806004)(55846006)(80976001)(74706001)(81542001)(49866001)(86362001)(92726001)(50466002)(74876001)(94316002)(44976005)(23726002)(53806001)(56776001)(83072002)(54356001)(81686001)(56816005)(63696002)(47776003)(2656002)(76786001)(20776003)(31966008)(87266001)(77096001)(33656001)(79102001)(80022001)(94946001)(65816001)(74662001)(74502001)(74366001)(90146001)(92566001)(76796001)(76482001)(85306002)(50986001)(54316002)(85852003)(47976001)(81342001)(47736001)(4396001)(46406003)(2201001)(51856001)(66066001)(87936001)(81816001)(85806002)(46102001)(69226001)(47446002)(83322001)(59766001)(77982001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN1PR03MB023; H:mail.microsoft.com; CLIP:131.107.125.37; FPR:B0A87600.B364D6DB.B87531C1.D6C97E75.20100; InfoDomainNonexistentMX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
X-O365ENT-EOP-Header: Message processed by - O365_ENT: Allow from ranges (Engineering ONLY)
X-Forefront-PRVS: 01110342A5
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
Cc: "6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses@tools.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 19:06:14 -0000

> MD5 is still useful as a checksum for really big files, where you're looking for accidental differences introduced by errors, and MD5's efficiency of computation is a win. But that says nothing about being tamper-proof. Think of it as a big CRC32, and CRC32 is not seen as having security properties.

But then, for applications like that, you can also use CRC64.

-- Christian Huitema