答复: Adoption Call for "IPv6 Application of the Alternate Marking Method"

[qinfengwei <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

There are too many issues required resolved. 
First is that CRH is a mapping table based solution, which means in a
large-scale multi-domain interconnect, like MPLS, the CRH suffers from the
large label stack and protection/ convergence challenges.
Second is that CRH and SRv6 are incompatible, which affects the existed
network deployment. 
Third is the security considerations are really not clear, meanwhile it is
very important for a operator.
The most important one is there are couple of similar solutions that need
discuss together.

I hope the WG could consider this point in the adoption call.

Thanks，
Fengwei Qin

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: ipv6 [mailto:[e-mail]] 代表 Bob Hinden
发送时间: 2020年5月16日 06:10
收件人: IPv6 List
抄送: Bob Hinden
主题: Adoption Call for "IPv6 Application of the Alternate Marking Method" 

This message starts a two week 6MAN call on adopting:

  Title:	   IPv6 Application of the Alternate Marking Method
  Authors:         G. Fioccola, T. Zhou, M. Cociglio, F. Qin
  File Name	   draft-fz-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-09
  Document date:   2020-05-04

  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fz-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-09

as a working group item. Substantive comments regarding adopting this
document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial suggestions can
be sent to the authors.  This adoption call will end on 29 May 2020.

There has been a lot of discussion on this draft, the chairs believe that
the major issues raised on the list are resolved in this version of draft
and it is ready for the working group to consider adopting as working group
draft.

Could those who are willing to work on this document, either as
contributors, authors or reviewers please notify the list.   That gives us
an indication of the energy level in the working group
to work on this.

Regards,
Bob and Ole