IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Why /64

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 28 October 2013 08:50 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2994E11E8237 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 01:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.077, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p1WhW7TD+vjP for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 01:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x229.google.com (mail-ie0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F9A11E8243 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 01:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id ar20so10777282iec.14 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 01:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=zBjtxgDoynOCP97/H1bRg29Y8vQc0/ydl1fJNbbAMBk=; b=hrhwh+BFX1CIsuT9Ghd9yYPk/u66SOcHOGQh87zWQL25iYp3KcbDvF47xLPGw7UOi9 p1f7ERzHXeUE+92flMbPgf3Yl3nEr5GOIWKVTT0QAZobjB5ERHuw+kdf+2TMHRo8ROe5 L6Z/Tz66IYHsLA5g9ZxW9OxTFtxwHDeCXg7fuXOjiJnnitLbQEihFa4GZPQsEDxEX3IW JGofKdCvdAwDz65E9GffSbSqlu/DI4SGGYjwerrLdrDFlIaARUotWeYqEY5dFQR73DIa hWM9XpSy+DaSuX7VWgsAXqYx5R+pMUThxGqYGkSK7wCNGbVrDrrXcQL9nX/snRjEkWt/ dbnA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=zBjtxgDoynOCP97/H1bRg29Y8vQc0/ydl1fJNbbAMBk=; b=S2O0rjiX5xanMEO3PJ7Ck8EdumiwrWr/XJxXzJsznBsIJ08NMPOr8GCnOH/s79Vuyn cRlF3IzRdqVfY21fX1ZLmA8FoGPWlX+E+fRtaW5ptt5O3vYJetw8hWrWnOadHYgaM7W/ hFX6eejq5jjOPWgeZlri+yE/9KS4A9CCPUGcsVZvDUaNvW5oy6qz9GG2XePpvZRhQhEb xAk+nurQOnn/W24XLC4oEEN1f+BOEbBhr54nKUpA27EAte2eXgHzndmdKkGr52C2n8V8 p5thRHekOO+tz/VMC2qM5ZSupCMO19vS5Vrd6b02yqbwgz4JopwU3rgF5ZK5wXHMuM5V 5KtA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQniytYl/Y/KdFHqkH1MBLUO/a4gwBgidtQgimdDf0TSMqIyD9zpUwWpZcd279noEZRK+p4F2FgrM0H06MgkCDs3iDUGqcvZ6S7Yrbe+cPcJVhWpSwlRMTl8XzYcF3R7u73PWX8gufo6d8w87D8S78kqPBH5cYb4YT6UODnwpmNAmbx11I7QCSrOlv/zsgzAUVzgZ4MS
X-Received: by 10.50.114.168 with SMTP id jh8mr7625555igb.6.1382950246502; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 01:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.86.106 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 01:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <526E250E.5050607@massar.ch>
References: <20131021224346.32495.64932.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <52695DDE.70909@gont.com.ar> <526AA24F.6010609@gmail.com> <526AACA5.7090604@si6networks.com> <E0F0D3DE-D31B-4CC2-9384-DFEBCCB8F557@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|9f43bef2fe7433173858819bd0eeee2dp9OKUJ03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|E0F0D3DE-D31B-4CC2-9384-DFEBCCB8F557@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <526AC8AF.4060608@si6networks.com> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553BA7B978@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <CAKD1Yr0q2dY041CMarFfTZZx6=qHC-eJ+74qgiHP-dt7+ga7yg@mail.gmail.com> <526CDC59.4070204@massar.ch> <CAKD1Yr0_anudWNpWRkvMGvD_pvyEscnuqEsPUy4YNm3e9Hue9g@mail.gmail.com> <CAPv4CP9k_J2GCOFhTCBz3U-nQmCWSjc4nceexaWwYZ-nDMpJmw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKFn1SG1PC_kA-pO5Or8VyeaOzvLfpmQe0LiiYkXU_HzNqGzCQ@mail.gmail.com> <526E250E.5050607@massar.ch>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:50:26 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1evbMf1pD4yBrZyvF2XLXGOre3bHDB0gOZTLme7vnh2A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why /64
To: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@massar.ch>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e01229f862f757604e9c93274"
Cc: "<ipv6@ietf.org>" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:50:55 -0000

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Jeroen Massar <jeroen@massar.ch> wrote:

> I am NOT arguing that a /64 should go the way of the dodo.
> I am only stating that this "IPv6 Privacy Address" thing is a myth.
>

Can you do so on another thread, please? This thread is about /64.

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status