Re: IPv6 payload length check?

Thanks Eric.

In this case the packet is *not* larger than the MTU of the outgoing link. Rather a packet has been received (or possibly generated locally) with an IPv6 payload length greater than the link layer frame size.

Probably this packet should not be forwarded. However, I couldn't find anything to say that it's invalid.

Thanks,
P.

On 03/02/2020 22:05, Erik Kline wrote:
Interestingly, 8200 contains this text in the Routing Header section (4.4):

"""
   If, after processing a Routing header of a received packet, an
   intermediate node determines that the packet is to be forwarded onto
   a link whose link MTU is less than the size of the packet, the node
   must discard the packet and send an ICMP Packet Too Big message to
   the packet's Source Address.
"""

Really that text would seem to apply even if a routing header is absent.  4443 on PTBs (3.2) has the text you might be looking for:

"""
   A Packet Too Big MUST be sent by a router in response to a packet
   that it cannot forward because the packet is larger than the MTU of
   the outgoing link.
"""

On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 7:31 AM Aitken, Paul <paul.aitken@intl.att.com<mailto:paul.aitken@intl.att.com>> wrote:
Can anyone point me to a standards reference for the check to validate
that the IPv6 payload length is less than or equal to the link layer
frame size upon forwarding a packet?

Thanks,
Paul
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_ipv6&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZfTZz_O9E1tN4KFtMYO2ZkKk5U5-6SlI-21vZEhzDuU&m=qBignlV2D2HjQ1OG98CXIFMbZryHbieyfesxKE4ZOfg&s=Hcp5fCXJd8pXcMtmqOUaw179roZQXSQntvE-zFdQYbY&e=>
--------------------------------------------------------------------