Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses

<Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> Tue, 27 March 2012 08:03 UTC

Return-Path: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9EBE21F8820 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bt9LnBmvZhK4 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-da01.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.128.24]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0470C21F859F for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vaebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (in-mx.nokia.com [10.160.244.31]) by mgw-da01.nokia.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q2R82cOh031060; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:03:15 +0300
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.61]) by vaebh105.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:02:58 +0300
Received: from 008-AM1MPN1-073.mgdnok.nokia.com ([169.254.3.150]) by 008-AM1MMR1-006.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.61]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.003; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:02:57 +0200
From: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
To: brian@innovationslab.net, ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses
Thread-Topic: 3484bis and privacy addresses
Thread-Index: AQHNC+wEu8NCxkDfTUqV7Z3zsBFou5Z9yECA
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:02:57 +0000
Message-ID: <CB9740BC.1C510%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F716D5C.40402@innovationslab.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121
x-originating-ip: [130.129.21.136]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <E232ED8EC72BB04D86442225295878BE@mgd.nokia.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Mar 2012 08:02:58.0427 (UTC) FILETIME=[05FF0CB0:01CD0BF0]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:03:23 -0000

Support option B.

-Raj

On 3/27/12 9:33 AM, "ext Brian Haberman" <brian@innovationslab.net> wrote:

>All,
>      The chairs would like to get a sense of the working group on
>changing the current (defined 3484) model of preferring public addresses
>over privacy addresses during the address selection process.  RFC 3484
>prefers public addresses with the ability (MAY) of an implementation to
>reverse the preference.  The suggestion has been made to reverse that
>preference in 3484bis (prefer privacy addresses over public ones).
>Regardless, the document will allow implementers/users to reverse the
>default preference.
>
>      Please state your preference for one of the following default
>options :
>
>A. Prefer public addresses over privacy addresses
>
>B. Prefer privacy addresses over public addresses
>
>Regards,
>Brian, Bob, & Ole
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>ipv6@ietf.org
>Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>--------------------------------------------------------------------