IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Interested in wireless ?

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sun, 31 May 2020 02:00 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCDE3A10C1 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 May 2020 19:00:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eYYOgvyLBTYU for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 May 2020 19:00:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FBD23A10C0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 May 2020 19:00:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.116] (p5089ae91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49ZM2S4SVDzyXr; Sun, 31 May 2020 04:00:16 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: Interested in wireless ?
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <A26FA9F8-72B8-4728-B978-6DDD271EC64D@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 04:00:16 +0200
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 612583216.018747-8c3e100401660ea0e8288b87f21f42b4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3B25C305-4773-4983-B92B-49534003860F@tzi.org>
References: <A26FA9F8-72B8-4728-B978-6DDD271EC64D@cisco.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/ytvBMciRPBu2of0NBA_hUewIY0s>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 02:00:24 -0000

> Since there’s so much energy on the list these days,

Hah.

> could we consider the adoption of
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-6man-ipv6-over-wireless-05
> ?

I think that rebranding 6lowpan-ND/RFC8505 as WiND and using that in more wireless networks than just the 6lo ones is a good idea.

I think we need a better coexistence/transition strategy before we can use it alongside ND-Classic, as will continue to be the normal case for WiFi.

(I have sent some editorial comments on the document to Pascal, and plan to send more.)

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email