IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6man-ll-prefix-len-17.txt

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Mon, 13 May 2019 13:36 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3E61200B7 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2019 06:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mzwW2YzLtlg1 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2019 06:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x734.google.com (mail-qk1-x734.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::734]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8154D120046 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2019 06:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x734.google.com with SMTP id k189so8004093qkc.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2019 06:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=IVogI7BUmy2rfP7x2OfvSLvb+aSnQKLWunyju87qPmo=; b=KDuxs5bDX/xbr9za8V7JbYlnIKjGPcsywcA3fFDxtIi1PkLSnWjyrCP7UxP6tgM7jo 3ugmlkq6Qr1gYX1AzywVkYam1XhbOYZKp1xJ9G9IVH+OCbgJiz+FFM6+URTA9Re6VIF9 By/qhqeiqJmWMRFf76okGscSAS7U9swI7xSdunFOZW8W/KgljUOrtvHp9XcTsJeXc8ml 4JcKPgBR2k6D1Y8dZn5djUXB5Hn13FBBzXbCUpYRYdr3Hwa3bFONIWgg951gEKu+oA0/ 77PMsuML/q3+1IoD3TQ+JgDndyetOKHD+89w9XSFZf7OXXsakDwa+cZU57ENkpyj/pxz Tv6w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=IVogI7BUmy2rfP7x2OfvSLvb+aSnQKLWunyju87qPmo=; b=jYGwLi7Y1yeTGTW4mV7zknzFHQho7nascp4CjwL5h7eb9mfGaPIaGzGVYqMfj4lf96 BSxzbENVHNIytukqwHJuG4wZ8xOOmKDrjtSSK4azg1kiF7npQhjuUD+l51i5OPwGo9uQ eMRL1tYTA1viqsm6AyibYKsqcoUmipNY4vYFQIg1LAL7NvR/8CHC2jaMxI91xRI+ewZ/ eBLJP67aFWNoSBcLEcwpd/Ikn9508GR0uGEMMSiol/ddNYfHLxnNXuns+lEyyXiEfcN8 wtjm2FepYvP0TPWUYiS0MfaMqtiR6/XyAwD1kl0kaqbewh0lTi4KI5upuX9g/3rh0se2 WmaA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWepkGAuzVBvGKWV3FkeNxQQ+VLP3WQwYh6UFgdiqHeQTXdj0/Z +laVRQ+P5AtGHDDUpN7gyCZMKZHQCpE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyamITig+1anR4CSUL5sxaQF0WJ3N4EQmajtLk9YcHLQ+QnukxEJvMB8mAR9iGxY5yAU8t8SA==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:63c2:: with SMTP id x185mr21807034qkb.40.1557754584280; Mon, 13 May 2019 06:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.213] (pool-72-83-194-140.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [72.83.194.140]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g15sm8320439qta.31.2019.05.13.06.36.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 May 2019 06:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6man-ll-prefix-len-17.txt
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16E227)
In-Reply-To: <20190513.115657.485273190.sthaug@nethelp.no>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 09:36:23 -0400
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CC44D89A-9002-4807-B43D-408B6B81D315@gmail.com>
References: <3353e235-8f20-eb1f-847b-16fda4db0a5e@gmail.com> <7BF15A55-7984-47B5-9D3D-394A838EE773@gmail.com> <3aca6800-8b3e-8a0e-eacb-2cd8eceddbb9@gmail.com> <20190513.115657.485273190.sthaug@nethelp.no>
To: sthaug@nethelp.no
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/zcuM7K3zwUQ0Nu8gLL5cVrW-FYg>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 13:36:27 -0000

Alex

I will bring up this topic on the LSR (link state routing) WG.

I agree that we need an IPv6 router id 128 bit expanded field and even now with the IPv6-only flag draft of which Microsoft and maybe other vendors are getting on board as major players that enterprises can definitely deploy managed networks to IPv6 only in the access side and use 6to4 nat 6to4 dns and 6to4 proxy for internal and external IPv4 resource access.

Thank you 

Gyan

Sent from my iPhone

On May 13, 2019, at 5:56 AM, sthaug@nethelp.no wrote:

>> My thought on this this the following: OSPF should update to allow
>> Router ID to be an IPv6 link-local address, not just an IPv4 address.
> 
> The OSPF router ID is a 32 bit number, *not* an IPv4 address. I see
> no good reason to change this, we simply need to have people stop
> *thinking* of it as an IPv4 address.
> 
>> MPLS and LDP should update to allow IPv6 addresses everywhere and not
>> rely on any form of IPv4.
> 
> LDPv6 already exists:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7552
> 
> Supported in for instance JunOS:
> 
> https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/ldp-native-ipv6-support-overview.html
> 
> Steinar Haug, AS2116
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email