Re: Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 27 February 2020 13:08 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4835E3A07C5 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:08:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UCuvsWiJPDZ5 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:08:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82c.google.com (mail-qt1-x82c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CD4D3A07B4 for <6man@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:08:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82c.google.com with SMTP id g21so2165884qtq.10 for <6man@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:08:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=UvNbUWTz51edZ+o2Q+K6j62njGquuHjb6vjFr1BgjWc=; b=ftxpRze9Hd5w9aK3AwtMajfzqvWznFaEcHvFqnbg0cEAJOhJXJYQ5A6NvZDiIcRTRw EJNIWmxCv0M2uTOVAmtCMJoDlwtuAkxz/Kyun6eoHE6jP0OcQ9YdxgDVIMRaQ9eImd3Y jgW4tO7VbeTFtBKP7MprUdxbN7H1BfMoAOZVTzrkLzUMYX6SoD5bB/gD8pH08HEFy4tY rEVhqDRdhT5+RWT6MYYq3FmIUYw3eASj5Qvm32CLMr8a+ZNhYUuoPMxqrUp1Gy79AS29 2/GqSjviaRbfqw+RUyH/nr2NJiA5jz2tkX8+1cCejTkp0jEC0OzjZ/2TCdV08zZ5teXk ZL5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=UvNbUWTz51edZ+o2Q+K6j62njGquuHjb6vjFr1BgjWc=; b=GIvHhJkLthkEODYjokwQbBDqzHEGi4AgXrzZWxMMmqr4s4dtitpno/F7XDvdg8cT7y yQJBVH5aDNaEQA9wDj263wSdV0a+ioIjtU2zzdavXCnVIo8v4MIg6V7gnX2P2cAkM/Uz GPLxXb2R6GuJzy1iP8BcrByRSJhwashwWTyVM2FcXT88sKmnGpb28DA/ziO0YG20Vujn rFIQPXF2cNDphwVKKuauwSPUV+V7uaTBzMUjd+pB10+l1rG+JD3yENsHEbRNKimPrNUa PwW+NLKCw13bNoMJDJj4I2NRbTLq9008scHhvYB6fhS/qMHjTbOXxR1y81hkDf96vuCw J69Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVfIlWCEAR/f+oqpcCPkfMt5m8d/6DASDZEa7tWGfjP9JVGYy+E 6srk6jqEt2mm3Z+FVdJS5nehsw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzpBeBSn0RYDH/x1P4r3pKHDmHBUtfMVxwaZ/RGz8p9h2AGqgkoXa4CGoWOZ4gbtgr5eYGhaQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:3ac6:: with SMTP id x64mr5080662qte.56.1582808929198; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:08:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18b:300:36ee:b8ed:c35:a977:7427? ([2601:18b:300:36ee:b8ed:c35:a977:7427]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o7sm3064274qkd.119.2020.02.27.05.08.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:08:48 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.13.2.1\))
Subject: Re: Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <C69945CF-0ED0-4CCB-96F6-03DA533A41B6@bell.ca>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 08:08:46 -0500
Cc: "Maojianwei (Mao)" <maojianwei@huawei.com>, Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>, "bruno.decraene@orange.com" <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <66327512-43CE-47CB-A5BD-10E5D8F71FD8@fugue.com>
References: <6B803B308679F94FBD953ABEA5CCCCD701089509@dggema524-mbx.china.huawei.com> <6E7A3022-DEC7-4E35-9A56-0F708CD41180@fugue.com> <C69945CF-0ED0-4CCB-96F6-03DA533A41B6@bell.ca>
To: "Voyer, Daniel" <daniel.voyer@bell.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.13.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/zgat3sngRmRdZFCEFS53DOH4GE8>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:08:51 -0000

On Feb 27, 2020, at 8:02 AM, Voyer, Daniel <daniel.voyer@bell.ca> wrote:
> You should rephrase that - 1 objection can’t prevent the rest of us to move forward hence why sometime we need to go with a rough consensus.

Rough consensus means all the objections have been addressed, not that everyone agrees.  The situation here is that all the objections appear not to have been addressed, and that agreed-upon supporting work has not been done (and nobody wants to do it).