RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses
Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com> Fri, 04 May 2012 00:40 UTC
Return-Path: <dthaler@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9EF11E8085 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2012 17:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.876
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.876 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.277, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eZsi8Wo6gAL2 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2012 17:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (am1ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.207]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9BE611E8080 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 May 2012 17:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail80-am1-R.bigfish.com (10.3.201.229) by AM1EHSOBE003.bigfish.com (10.3.204.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 4 May 2012 00:40:30 +0000
Received: from mail80-am1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail80-am1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1FB402AF for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 May 2012 00:40:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-SpamScore: 0
X-BigFish: VS0(zzzz1202hzzz2fh2a8h668h839h944hd25h)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.8; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:TK5EX14HUBC106.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
Received-SPF: pass (mail80-am1: domain of microsoft.com designates 131.107.125.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=131.107.125.8; envelope-from=dthaler@microsoft.com; helo=TK5EX14HUBC106.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ; icrosoft.com ;
Received: from mail80-am1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail80-am1 (MessageSwitch) id 1336092027886843_10143; Fri, 4 May 2012 00:40:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from AM1EHSMHS008.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.201.240]) by mail80-am1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A3820058 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 May 2012 00:40:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC106.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.8) by AM1EHSMHS008.bigfish.com (10.3.207.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 4 May 2012 00:40:26 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MLTW653.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com (157.54.24.14) by TK5EX14HUBC106.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.80.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.298.5; Fri, 4 May 2012 00:40:35 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXW605.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([169.254.5.160]) by TK5EX14MLTW653.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.24.14]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.005; Thu, 3 May 2012 17:40:35 -0700
From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
To: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses
Thread-Topic: 3484bis and privacy addresses
Thread-Index: AQHNGUajDaqZ7/kESEaVgy0zYPsEC5aZSPWQgAErsYCAACukIIAeSMbQ
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 00:40:34 +0000
Message-ID: <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B5AF1C5@TK5EX14MBXW605.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
References: <4F716D5C.40402@innovationslab.net> <4F726C9E.50107@gmail.com> <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B5054C1@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <4F83D8D0.5030402@gmail.com> <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B508719@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <4F858C32.6060709@globis.net> <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B50CBC2@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <4F87D4EA.4040801@globis.net> <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B513879@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <4F8935C7.6020602@globis.net> <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B5159E0@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B5159E0@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.28]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 00:40:44 -0000
I wrote in response to Ray Hunter: > I take your comment as asking for a summary table in rfc 3484bis of > system-wide config options. That could be done as a purely editorial > change, although if there's only 1 thing in the table it's less interesting. > But if others in the WG think this would be helpful, then yes we can do that. Turns out there were already 2 things so I've done this in -03. OLD: This specification optionally allows for the possibility of administrative configuration of policy (e.g., via manual configuration or a DHCP option such as that proposed in [I-D.ietf-6man-addr-select-opt]) that can override the default behavior of the algorithms. The policy override takes the form of a configurable table that specifies precedence values and preferred source prefixes for destination prefixes. If an implementation is not configurable, or if an implementation has not been configured, then the default policy table specified in this document SHOULD be used. NEW: This specification optionally allows for the possibility of administrative configuration of policy (e.g., via manual configuration or a DHCP option such as that proposed in [I-D.ietf-6man-addr-select-opt]) that can override the default behavior of the algorithms. The policy override consists of the following set of state, which SHOULD be configurable: o Policy Table (Section 2.1): a table that specifies precedence values and preferred source prefixes for destination prefixes. o Automatic Row Additions flag (Section 2.1): a flag that specifies whether the implementation may automatically add site-specific rows for certain types of addresses. o Privacy Preference flag (Section 5): a flag that specifies whether temporary source addresses or stable source addresses are preferred by default, when both types exist. This is purely an editorial change. The rest of Ray's comments apply to I-D.ietf-6man-addr-select-opt, which is already informatively referenced in the above text. -Dave
- 3484bis and privacy addresses Brian Haberman
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Tim Chown
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Arifumi Matsumoto
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Teemu Savolainen
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Francis Dupont
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Wuyts Carl
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Mohacsi Janos
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Roland Bless
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Samita Chakrabarti
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Simon Perreault
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Alex Abrahams
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Tina TSOU
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Karl Auer
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Karl Auer
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Fernando Gont
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Jong-Hyouk Lee
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Fernando Gont
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Francis Dupont
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Brian Haberman
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Fernando Gont
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Fernando Gont
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Karl Auer
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses STARK, BARBARA H
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Karl Auer
- Re: Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Doug Barton
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Francis Dupont
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses t.petch
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Alex Abrahams
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Doug Barton
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Mark Andrews
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Fernando Gont
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dave Thaler
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses james woodyatt
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Sander Steffann
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dominik Elsbroek
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Brian E Carpenter
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dave Thaler
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Brian E Carpenter
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dave Thaler
- Re: RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- RE: RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dave Thaler
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dave Thaler
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dave Thaler
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dave Thaler
- Re: RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Arifumi Matsumoto
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Roger Jørgensen
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses jonne.soininen