Re: [ire] Header question (draft-arias-noguchi-dnrd-objects-mapping-03)

Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de> Thu, 16 May 2013 07:19 UTC

Return-Path: <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
X-Original-To: ire@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ire@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A626521F907E for <ire@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 00:19:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T6m5kQzxyO6B for <ire@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 00:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kmx10a.knipp.de (clust3b.bbone.knipp.de [195.253.6.85]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F34121F90EB for <ire@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 00:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kmx10a.knipp.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11DD676; Thu, 16 May 2013 09:19:16 +0200 (MESZ)
X-Knipp-VirusScanned: Yes
Received: from kmx10a.knipp.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kmx10a.knipp.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10004) with ESMTP id 7QFJWQZXN6zx; Thu, 16 May 2013 09:19:10 +0200 (MESZ)
Received: from hp9000.do.knipp.de (hp9000.do.knipp.de [195.253.2.54]) by kmx10a.knipp.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6438572; Thu, 16 May 2013 09:19:10 +0200 (MESZ)
Received: from [195.253.2.27] (mclane.do.knipp.de [195.253.2.27]) by hp9000.do.knipp.de (@(#)Sendmail version 8.13.3 - Revision 1.000 - 1st August,2006/8.13.3) with ESMTP id r4G7J7AK025667; Thu, 16 May 2013 09:19:10 +0200 (MESZ)
Message-ID: <5194886B.10209@knipp.de>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 09:19:07 +0200
From: Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0a1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ire@ietf.org
References: <51838C04.2050000@knipp.de>
In-Reply-To: <51838C04.2050000@knipp.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [ire] Header question (draft-arias-noguchi-dnrd-objects-mapping-03)
X-BeenThere: ire@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Internet Registration Escrow discussion list." <ire.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ire>, <mailto:ire-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ire>
List-Post: <mailto:ire@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ire-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ire>, <mailto:ire-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 07:19:27 -0000

On 03/05/13 12:05, Klaus Malorny wrote:


Hi,

I don't want to be annoying, but I would highly appreciate if someone of the 
authors or others could comment on my recent question. Thanks in advance.

Regards,

Klaus

>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a question to the Header object (section 5.9). Sorry if this has been
> asked/answered already, I just subscribed to the list in order to clarify an
> understanding problem that came up and did not want to walk through all the
> previous posts.
>
> The question is rather simple: is the Header object mandatory, and if so, may it
> also be placed at the end of the deposit (which should be possible from an XML
> schema standpoint)? One the one hand, we would like to avoid the extra counting
> in the database, on the other hand we would like to avoid to build up the whole
> XML document in the memory first just to insert the header at the top after
> having counted the objects during the generation of their XML representation.
>
> Regards,
>
> Klaus