Re: [ire] Extended Verification Process

Gustavo Lozano <> Wed, 27 March 2013 01:25 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361F221F86F5 for <>; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DFGaoutU8Icu for <>; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC6F21F84CE for <>; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:25:45 -0700
From: Gustavo Lozano <>
To: David Kipling <>, "" <>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:25:42 -0700
Thread-Topic: Extended Verification Process
Thread-Index: Ac4qigD4f9miWR3VQnWrEunxGk4RGQ==
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <31655AEAB7ACEE41A2D1321E18D4BF3261D4A0DF@manexchprd01>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CD77981AEABAgustavolozanoicannorg_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [ire] Extended Verification Process
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Internet Registration Escrow discussion list." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 01:25:47 -0000

Hi David,

Comments inline.


From: David Kipling <<>>
Date: Friday, March 15, 2013 3:21 AM
To: Gustavo Lozano <<>>, "<>" <<>>
Subject: Extended Verification Process

Hi Gustavo,

At NCC Group we are working on the extended verification process and have noted a query around the RDE policy rule.  The element allows you to specify required fields such as “<rdePolicy:policy element="rdeDom:registrant" />” as required.  The issue I have with this is that the scope of the element needs to be known to be able to perform the check e.g. is it :

·        one registrant per deposit?

·        one registrant per domain record?

·        one registrant per postalInfo element in each contact record?

You have the namespace, though I would suggest to be clear that the policy element is altered to include the scope of the parent element as an XPath query:

“<rdePolicy:policy scope=”{XPath query}” element="{qualified element name}" />”
“<rdePolicy:policy scope=”//rde:deposit/rde:contents/rdeDomain:domain” element="rdeDomain:registrant" />”

What are your thoughts?

This makes a lot of sense. I will discuss with the co authors of the draft, the inclusion of this idea, in the new version of the draft (merge of CSV and XML).


David Kipling

1.      I have some really easy XPath queries etc. setup to handle the extended validation though my issue is with the CSV files.  Looks like I’m going to have to build a module to load all the csv elements into the same XML file for me to process.  It’s a shame it isn’t just XML as the process would be a lot easier including the Open Source Tool.


David Kipling
IT Service Desk Analyst
NCC Group
Manchester Technology Centre, Oxford Road
Manchester, M1 7EF

Telephone: +44 161 209 5430
        [] <>

This email is sent for and on behalf of NCC Group. NCC Group is the trading name of NCC Services Limited (Registered in England CRN: 2802141). Registered Office: Manchester Technology Centre, Oxford Road, Manchester, M1 7EF. The ultimate holding company is NCC Group plc (Registered in England CRN: 4627044).

Confidentiality: This e-mail contains proprietary information, some or all of which may be confidential and/or legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient only. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and then delete the original. If you are not the intended recipient you may not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on any information contained in this e-mail. You must not inform any other person other than NCC Group or the sender of its existence.

For more information about NCC Group please visit<>

P Before you print think about the ENVIRONMENT