Re: [ire] CSV woes: unused namespaces?

Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de> Fri, 04 October 2013 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
X-Original-To: ire@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ire@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0580421F99F4 for <ire@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 08:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uXL-+TBqXBdr for <ire@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 08:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kmx10a.knipp.de (clust3c.bbone.knipp.de [195.253.6.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E8221F9AA7 for <ire@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 08:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.bbone.knipp.de [127.0.0.1]) by kmx10a.knipp.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFD461; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 17:30:02 +0200 (MESZ)
X-Knipp-VirusScanned: Yes
Received: from kmx10a.knipp.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kmx10a.knipp.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10004) with ESMTP id L7a2mgRpJdvw; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 17:29:54 +0200 (MESZ)
Received: from hp9000.do.knipp.de (hp9000.do.knipp.de [195.253.2.54]) by kmx10a.knipp.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0FF60; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 17:29:54 +0200 (MESZ)
Received: from [195.253.2.27] (mclane.do.knipp.de [195.253.2.27]) by hp9000.do.knipp.de (@(#)Sendmail version 8.13.3 - Revision 1.000 - 1st August,2006/8.13.3) with ESMTP id r94FTrBN000315; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 17:29:53 +0200 (MESZ)
Message-ID: <524EDEF5.6060709@knipp.de>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 17:29:57 +0200
From: Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/27.0a1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Gould, James" <JGould@verisign.com>, "ire@ietf.org" <ire@ietf.org>
References: <CE7434FB.4FC80%jgould@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <CE7434FB.4FC80%jgould@verisign.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [ire] CSV woes: unused namespaces?
X-BeenThere: ire@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Internet Registration Escrow discussion list." <ire.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ire>, <mailto:ire-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ire>
List-Post: <mailto:ire@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ire-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ire>, <mailto:ire-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 15:30:46 -0000

On 04.10.2013 15:31, Gould, James wrote:
> Klaus,
>
> Each of the XSD's referenced in the I-D includes a set of IANA URI
> requests for both urn:ietf:params:xml:ns (e.g.
> urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeCsv-1.0) and urn:ietf:params:xml:schema (e.g.
> urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:rdeCsv-1.0).
> [...]
>
> Thanks,
>



Hi James,

thanks. I was not fully aware of the RFC 3866 registration procedures, i.e. that 
the registered "schema" URIs refer to the actual XML Schema files themselves and 
are not other namespace URIs. So that makes now sense to me.

Regards,

Klaus