[ire] XML rgpStatus definition

[Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

If i read rfc3915 (the EPP Grace Period Mapping) RGP state diagram
correctly then a domain can only ever be in one gracePeriod.

In https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arias-noguchi-dnrd-objects-mapping-05
, however, specifies it as

             <element name="status"
               type="domain:statusType" maxOccurs="11"/>
             <element name="rgpStatus"
               type="rgp:statusType" minOccurs="0"
               maxOccurs="unbounded"/>

Where RFC3915 defines rgp:statusType as

     <complexType name="statusType">
       <simpleContent>
         <extension base="normalizedString">
           <attribute name="s" type="rgp:statusValueType"
            use="required"/>
           <attribute name="lang" type="language" default="en"/>
         </extension>
       </simpleContent>
     </complexType>

     <simpleType name="statusValueType">
       <restriction base="token">
         <enumeration value="addPeriod"/>
         <enumeration value="autoRenewPeriod"/>
         <enumeration value="renewPeriod"/>
         <enumeration value="transferPeriod"/>
         <enumeration value="pendingDelete"/>
         <enumeration value="pendingRestore"/>
         <enumeration value="redemptionPeriod"/>
       </restriction>
     </simpleType>

1) Why is the rde:rgpStatus not a single element? Maybe for later
extensions? Or is that just a copy'n pasto from the normal object's
status? Just curious about this one..

2) Some poor guy from donuts rightfully noted that the lack of a
gracePeriod's endDate in the escrow-data is inconvenient.
What about officially adding something like e.g.:

      <rdeDomain:rgpStatus s="addPeriod">
        <!--<rdeDomain:rgpEndDate>2015-04-20T08:41:22.174588Z</rdeDomain:rgpEndDate>-->
      </rdeDomain:rgpStatus>

thanks,