IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ire] About Host Data Issue

Gustavo Lozano <gustavo.lozano@icann.org> Wed, 15 May 2013 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
X-Original-To: ire@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ire@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9BDA21F8A53 for <ire@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2013 08:44:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k7RaL-cZ3SDC for <ire@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2013 08:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXPFE100-1.exc.icann.org (expfe100-1.exc.icann.org [64.78.22.236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7B021F8ED8 for <ire@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2013 08:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by EXPFE100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.236]) with mapi; Wed, 15 May 2013 08:44:35 -0700
From: Gustavo Lozano <gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
To: Francisco Obispo <fobispo@isc.org>, James Mitchell <james.mitchell@ausregistry.com.au>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 08:44:35 -0700
Thread-Topic: [ire] About Host Data Issue
Thread-Index: Ac5Rgxnoi2ns2vrLTLO9jvwg8hpK8A==
Message-ID: <CDB8F9C1.12423%gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <F3FBEC1E-4B04-41E9-B38F-F73E90F08DAC@isc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3451452275_1980474"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: liushuo <liushuo@knet.cn>, ire <ire@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ire] About Host Data Issue
X-BeenThere: ire@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Internet Registration Escrow discussion list." <ire.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ire>, <mailto:ire-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ire>
List-Post: <mailto:ire@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ire-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ire>, <mailto:ire-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 15:44:40 -0000

Hi All,

Comments in line.

Regards,
Gustavo

On 5/15/13 8:35 AM, "Francisco Obispo" <fobispo@isc.org> wrote:

>Hi James,
>
>
>
>On May 15, 2013, at 7:18 AM, James Mitchell
><james.mitchell@ausregistry.com.au> wrote:
>
>> I see no need for a deposit to include external hosts, however their
>>omission may complicate the process of restoring a registry.
>
>
>I believe they both need to be included, because the sponsorship
>component is very important.
>
>
>
>>  Furthermore, I'd expect escrow agents check that all name-server
>>associations have corresponding host objects, where host objects are
>>used.
>> 
>
>It would be ideal if we could get some clarity with regards of what type
>of checks Escrow agents are supposed to be doing.

The answer is C + other validations (e.g. NNDN comparison with Domain Name)

>
>They could technically:
>
>A) Verify just the signature
>B) Verify the signature + schema
>C) Verify the signature + schema + object relationships
>D) Do none of the above
>
>
>
>> Regards,
>> James
>
>Francisco Obispo 
>Director of Applications and Services - ISC
>email: fobispo@isc.org
>Phone: +1 650 423 1374 || INOC-DBA *3557* NOC
>PGP KeyID = B38DB1BE
>
>_______________________________________________
>ire mailing list
>ire@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ire

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email