Re: Keywords, direct navigation, and search layer 2 (was: RE: "so -called" keyword and layer 3)
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net> Sun, 09 December 2001 17:52 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-irnss-errors@lists.elistx.com>
Received: from ELIST-DAEMON.eListX.com by eListX.com (PMDF V6.0-025 #44856) id <0GO3007048AXF8@eListX.com> (original mail from brunner@nic-naa.net); Sun, 09 Dec 2001 12:52:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON.eListX.com by eListX.com (PMDF V6.0-025 #44856) id <0GO3007018AWF6@eListX.com> for ietf-irnss@elist.lists.elistx.com (ORCPT ietf-irnss@lists.elistx.com); Sun, 09 Dec 2001 12:52:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from DIRECTORY-DAEMON.eListX.com by eListX.com (PMDF V6.0-025 #44856) id <0GO3007018AWF5@eListX.com> for ietf-irnss@elist.lists.elistx.com (ORCPT ietf-irnss@lists.elistx.com); Sun, 09 Dec 2001 12:52:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nic-naa.net (216-220-241-232.midmaine.com [216.220.241.232]) by eListX.com (PMDF V6.0-025 #44856) with ESMTP id <0GO3000OA8AVMP@eListX.com> for ietf-irnss@lists.elistx.com; Sun, 09 Dec 2001 12:52:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nic-naa.net (localhost.nic-naa.net [127.0.0.1]) by nic-naa.net (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id fB9Ho2l37933; Sun, 09 Dec 2001 12:50:02 -0500 (EST envelope-from brunner@nic-naa.net)
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 12:50:02 -0500
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Subject: Re: Keywords, direct navigation, and search layer 2 (was: RE: "so -called" keyword and layer 3)
In-reply-to: "Your message of Sun, 09 Dec 2001 11:54:42 EST." <20011209115442.B19732@bailey.dscga.com>
To: Michael Mealling <michael@neonym.net>
Cc: Yves Arrouye <yves@realnames.com>, ietf-irnss@lists.elistx.com
Message-id: <200112091750.fB9Ho2l37933@nic-naa.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-irnss-help@lists.elistx.com>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-irnss@lists.elistx.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.elistx.com/ob/adm.pl>, <mailto:ietf-irnss-request@lists.elistx.com?body=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.elistx.com/ob/adm.pl>, <mailto:ietf-irnss-request@lists.elistx.com?body=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.elistx.com/archives/ietf-irnss>
List-Help: <http://lists.elistx.com/elists/admin.shtml>, <mailto:ietf-irnss-request@lists.elistx.com?body=help>
List-Id: <ietf-irnss.lists.elistx.com>
> I would prefer that > both 'web' and 'mobile web' be folded into 'browsing' I think I thought so prior to last December, when I went to the W3C-WAPF powwow on mobility and privacy. Now I'm not so sure. Private gardens exist, as do NATs, and it may do more harm than good to streeeetch a service over breaks in the end-2-end address model. Duct tape anyone? Eric
- KW requirement from user perspective karen
- Re: Keywords, direct navigation, and search layer… Michael Mealling
- RE: Keywords, direct navigation, and search layer… Nicolas Popp
- RE: Keywords, direct navigation, and search layer… Yves Arrouye
- Re: Keywords, direct navigation, and search layer… James Seng/Personal
- RE: Keywords, direct navigation, and search layer… Yves Arrouye
- Re: Keywords, direct navigation, and search layer… Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: Keywords, direct navigation, and search layer… Michael Mealling
- RE: Keywords, direct navigation, and search layer… Yves Arrouye
- RE: Keywords, direct navigation, and search layer… Yves Arrouye