Re: Where we stand and where we are going

Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net> Thu, 27 June 2002 19:32 UTC

Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 15:31:12 -0400
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Subject: Re: Where we stand and where we are going
In-reply-to: "Your message of Thu, 27 Jun 2002 11:44:51 PDT." <7FC3066C236FD511BC5900508BAC86FED21D31@trestles.internal.realnames.com>
To: Nicolas Popp <nico@realnames.com>
Cc: 'Leslie Daigle' <leslie@thinkingcat.com>, John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>, Michael Mealling <michael@neonym.net>, ietf-irnss@lists.elistx.com, brunner@nic-naa.net
Message-id: <200206271931.g5RJVCBZ012813@nic-naa.net>
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN

> That being said, I am not even sure why we are focusing on the transport at
> this stage.

Fine. However, it is possible that foo-over-udp and bar-over-tcp won't look
like twins seperated at birth.

Re: Where we stand and where we are going Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Rob Austein
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
RE: Where we stand and where we are going John C Klensin
RE: Where we stand and where we are going Nicolas Popp
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Patrik Fältström
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Michael Mealling
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Rob Austein
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Leslie Daigle
Re: Where we stand and where we are going John C Klensin
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Michael Mealling
Where we stand and where we are going John C Klensin
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Erik Nordmark
Re: Where we stand and where we are going bmanning