Re: INTLOC, IRNSS, and Salt Lake City

Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org> Fri, 15 February 2002 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-irnss-errors@lists.elistx.com>
Received: from ELIST-DAEMON.eListX.com by eListX.com (PMDF V6.0-025 #44856) id <0GRJ00E04XWOSF@eListX.com> (original mail from phoffman@imc.org); Thu, 14 Feb 2002 21:07:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON.eListX.com by eListX.com (PMDF V6.0-025 #44856) id <0GRJ00E01XWNSD@eListX.com> for ietf-irnss@elist.lists.elistx.com (ORCPT ietf-irnss@lists.elistx.com); Thu, 14 Feb 2002 21:07:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from DIRECTORY-DAEMON.eListX.com by eListX.com (PMDF V6.0-025 #44856) id <0GRJ00E01XWNSC@eListX.com> for ietf-irnss@elist.lists.elistx.com (ORCPT ietf-irnss@lists.elistx.com); Thu, 14 Feb 2002 21:07:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by eListX.com (PMDF V6.0-025 #44856) with ESMTP id <0GRJ00AJSXWMV4@eListX.com> for ietf-irnss@lists.elistx.com; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 21:07:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [165.227.249.20] (165-227-249-20.client.dsl.net [165.227.249.20]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g1F24V304878; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 18:04:31 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 18:04:15 -0800
From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>
Subject: Re: INTLOC, IRNSS, and Salt Lake City
In-reply-to: <42541853.1013718256@localhost>
X-Sender: phoffman@mail.imc.org
To: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>, intloc@ops.ietf.org, ietf-irnss@lists.elistx.com
Cc: harald@alvestrand.no
Message-id: <p0510141db8921c83bd36@[165.227.249.20]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii
References: <42541853.1013718256@localhost>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-irnss-help@lists.elistx.com>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-irnss@lists.elistx.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.elistx.com/ob/adm.pl>, <mailto:ietf-irnss-request@lists.elistx.com?body=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.elistx.com/ob/adm.pl>, <mailto:ietf-irnss-request@lists.elistx.com?body=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.elistx.com/archives/ietf-irnss>
List-Help: <http://lists.elistx.com/elists/admin.shtml>, <mailto:ietf-irnss-request@lists.elistx.com?body=help>
List-Id: <ietf-irnss.lists.elistx.com>

I think it would be a Good Thing for IRNSS to meet, and to have a 
focused agenda posted two weeks before the meeting. Normally, I am 
not in favor of having face-to-face meetings regulated by someone 
with a whip who is not smiling, but I will strongly favor it again 
for IRNSS.

I see no reason for INTLOC to meet again. The sense of the last BOF 
was one of only mild interest from most of the participants.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium