Re: INTLOC, IRNSS, and Salt Lake City

John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com> Fri, 15 February 2002 02:23 UTC

Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 21:20:09 -0500
From: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
Subject: Re: INTLOC, IRNSS, and Salt Lake City
In-reply-to: <p0510141db8921c83bd36@[165.227.249.20]>
To: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>, intloc@ops.ietf.org, ietf-irnss@lists.elistx.com
Cc: harald@alvestrand.no
Message-id: <45895701.1013721609@localhost>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-disposition: inline
References: <p0510141db8921c83bd36@[165.227.249.20]>

--On Thursday, 14 February, 2002 18:04 -0800 "Paul Hoffman /
IMC" <phoffman@imc.org> wrote:

> I think it would be a Good Thing for IRNSS to meet, and to
> have a focused agenda posted two weeks before the meeting.
> Normally, I am not in favor of having face-to-face meetings
> regulated by someone with a whip who is not smiling, but I
> will strongly favor it again for IRNSS.

Paul,

I think the key question is what should be on that agenda.
Appearances to the contrary notwithstanding, whip-wielding is
not an activity I find very pleasant and it is something that
I/we should be able to do much less of with a focused and
topical agenda.  But the SLS and "keywords" people ought to be
far enough along to propose their own agendas and BOFs (or WGs),
there hasn't been any significant on-list discussion, so, again,
what do you see as topics?  Or should we, instead, organize one
or more bar-bofs to talk about dns-search-03 and what we should
be doing next?

    john

Re: INTLOC, IRNSS, and Salt Lake City Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Re: INTLOC, IRNSS, and Salt Lake City John C Klensin
Re: INTLOC, IRNSS, and Salt Lake City Paul Hoffman / IMC
INTLOC, IRNSS, and Salt Lake City John C Klensin