RE: "so-called" keyword and layer 3

[Yves Arrouye <[e-mail]>]

> Dear Yves Arrouye,
> 
> If we do not give a specific group an authority to decide who can get,
> let me handle "overseer" issue in an extremely dirty way. Let's add
> "overseer" as a facet. Then, we have { name string, industry category,
> country, overseer } tuple. If overseer is "trademark office" then all
> four attribute values are used to find a unique trademark from trademark
> db. Else if overseer is "none" (or "keyword" ?) then "industry category"
> field will be empty or not used even if supplied. Do you like it ?

Well, I do not want to be the one to cause a dirty solution... My sole point
was that there is a manifest conflict between the desire not to involve
organizations like WIPO, and proposals that have been done and rely on this
organization's work. I don't think adding an overseer will help.

YA