Re: Where we stand and where we are going

Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net> Fri, 28 June 2002 03:12 UTC

Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 23:05:09 -0400
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Subject: Re: Where we stand and where we are going
In-reply-to: "Your message of Thu, 27 Jun 2002 19:31:43 EDT." <20020627233143.BCAB018AC@thrintun.hactrn.net>
To: Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>
Cc: ietf-irnss@lists.elistx.com, brunner@nic-naa.net
Message-id: <200206280305.g5S359BZ013903@nic-naa.net>
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN

> Which, for many protocols, would be a Bad Thing (tm), but for an
> idempotent protocol in which it is cheaper to re-run the query than to
> stash replies in case something bad happens, this might be the best
> one can do.

Yeah. I've been thinking of an optimization for the epp check to run over
udp for just this reason.

Re: Where we stand and where we are going Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Rob Austein
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
RE: Where we stand and where we are going John C Klensin
RE: Where we stand and where we are going Nicolas Popp
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Patrik Fältström
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Michael Mealling
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Rob Austein
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Leslie Daigle
Re: Where we stand and where we are going John C Klensin
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Michael Mealling
Where we stand and where we are going John C Klensin
Re: Where we stand and where we are going Erik Nordmark
Re: Where we stand and where we are going bmanning