IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?

Gert Grammel <ggrammel@juniper.net> Mon, 12 November 2012 15:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ggrammel@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6EF21F862E for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 07:19:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.467
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.467 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MR17se+IF6Y2 for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 07:19:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og114.obsmtp.com (exprod7og114.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.215]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F2C21F85F0 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 07:19:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob114.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUKETkj3sIjxLtlD7a4tr8lzHabEP31KZ@postini.com; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 07:19:47 PST
Received: from P-CLDFE02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.60) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 07:19:35 -0800
Received: from o365mail.juniper.net (207.17.137.149) by o365mail.juniper.net (172.24.192.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.355.2; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 07:19:35 -0800
Received: from CO9EHSOBE035.bigfish.com (207.46.163.28) by o365mail.juniper.net (207.17.137.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 07:21:58 -0800
Received: from mail168-co9-R.bigfish.com (10.236.132.241) by CO9EHSOBE035.bigfish.com (10.236.130.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:19:34 +0000
Received: from mail168-co9 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail168-co9-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C40B1C00C9 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org.FOPE.CONNECTOR.OVERRIDE>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:19:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.245.197; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:CH1PRD0511HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT
X-SpamScore: -25
X-BigFish: PS-25(zz9371I542M1432I4015I14ffIzz1de0h1202h1d1ah1d2ahzz1033IL8275dhz2dh2a8h668h839h944hd25hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0l1155h)
Received: from mail168-co9 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail168-co9 (MessageSwitch) id 1352733572696542_14846; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:19:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CO9EHSMHS028.bigfish.com (unknown [10.236.132.236]) by mail168-co9.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61A18C0056; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:19:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CH1PRD0511HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.245.197) by CO9EHSMHS028.bigfish.com (10.236.130.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:19:30 +0000
Received: from CH1PRD0511MB431.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.204]) by CH1PRD0511HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.159.38]) with mapi id 14.16.0233.002; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:19:21 +0000
From: Gert Grammel <ggrammel@juniper.net>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "irs-discuss@ietf.org" <irs-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?
Thread-Index: Ac3A5PsIVqU8XiJmRGOy8kKrHtrEtQAAbRswAACOfHA=
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:19:20 +0000
Message-ID: <305443B66F0CD946A3107753337A03110B07E8@CH1PRD0511MB431.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <015701cdc0e4$fbc439f0$f34cadd0$@olddog.co.uk> <B6585D85A128FD47857D0FD58D8120D3A8D386@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <B6585D85A128FD47857D0FD58D8120D3A8D386@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.224.53]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%OLDDOG.CO.UK$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:19:48 -0000

We have already a PCE, so why not go for a Route Computation Engine (RCE)?

Gert

-----Original Message-----
From: irs-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:irs-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Zafar Ali (zali)
Sent: Montag, 12. November 2012 16:05
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk; irs-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?

Hi All- 

How about IRE (system -> engine). 

n.b. I do not have any objection to IRS (they just charge too much tax ;-)) or favor to any name. 

Thanks

Regards...Zafar

> -----Original Message-----
> From: irs-discuss-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:irs-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 9:50 AM
> To: irs-discuss@ietf.org
> Subject: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?
> 
> Personally, I find discussions of what name/acronym to use a bit sad. 
> I've had enough code review hours wasted debating the names of 
> variables to not want to spend any more time on this sort of thing.
> 
> However, I note that there was some unease about the use of IRS. If we 
> really need to find a new name for this work (and I note that RSI is 
> also used for something else) we need to find a solution soon.
> 
> Can I suggest that only those people who have a strong objection to 
> IRS need to contribute to the discussion. Furthermore, we don't need 
> suggestions to be floated, we need solid and definite proposals. That way we will possibly reach a serious conclusion quickly.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> irs-discuss mailing list
> irs-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss
_______________________________________________
irs-discuss mailing list
irs-discuss@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status