Re: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?

["Andrew McLachlan (amclachl)" <[e-mail]>]

I'm ok with the current one, and it's kinda stuck in a lot of peoples minds. Might be a bit like changing the name of a puppy after 6 months of calling him Rover....

On 12 Nov 2012, at 17:11, Alia Atlas <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
 wrote:

IRS, I2RS or ITRS all sound fine to me.

Alia


On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Ross Callon <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
I am fine with any of: ITRS, I2RS, or RSI. Any of them are similar enough to IRS to help us make the connection, without being confused or reminding me of something else.

Ross

-----Original Message-----
From: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> [mailto:[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>] On Behalf Of Lucy yong
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 11:07 AM
To: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>; Raveendra Torvi
Cc: <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?

I like this name: I2RS.
Lucy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> [mailto:[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>]
> On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 9:44 AM
> To: Raveendra Torvi
> Cc: <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?
>
> On 12/11/2012 15:06, Raveendra Torvi wrote:
> > My first set of suggestions:
> >
> > I2RS- interface 2 routing system.
> That as well
>
> Stewart
>
> >
> > IRNE - interface to routing network element.
> > IRE - interface to routing element
> > INE - interface to network element.
> > APIRS - API to RS.
> > APIRE
> >
> > Ravi
> > On Nov 12, 2012, at 9:56 AM, "Adrian Farrel" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Personally, I find discussions of what name/acronym to use a bit sad.
> I've had
> >> enough code review hours wasted debating the names of variables to
> not want to
> >> spend any more time on this sort of thing.
> >>
> >> However, I note that there was some unease about the use of IRS. If
> we really
> >> need to find a new name for this work (and I note that RSI is also
> used for
> >> something else) we need to find a solution soon.
> >>
> >> Can I suggest that only those people who have a strong objection to
> IRS need to
> >> contribute to the discussion. Furthermore, we don't need suggestions
> to be
> >> floated, we need solid and definite proposals. That way we will
> possibly reach a
> >> serious conclusion quickly.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Adrian
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> irs-discuss mailing list
> >> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > irs-discuss mailing list
> > [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss
> >
>
>
> --
> For corporate legal information go to:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> irs-discuss mailing list
> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss
_______________________________________________
irs-discuss mailing list
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss


_______________________________________________
irs-discuss mailing list
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss

_______________________________________________
irs-discuss mailing list
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss