Re: [irs-discuss] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-amante-irs-topology-use-cases-00.txt

Iftekhar Hussain <IHussain@infinera.com> Sun, 07 October 2012 22:00 UTC

Return-Path: <IHussain@infinera.com>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EEA21F8681 for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 15:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rE7oyAmbsX+d for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 15:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sv-casht-prod1.infinera.com (sv-casht-prod1.infinera.com [8.4.225.24]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4709E21F8679 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 15:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera.com ([fe80::dc68:4e20:6002:a8f9]) by sv-casht-prod1.infinera.com ([10.100.97.218]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 15:00:15 -0700
From: Iftekhar Hussain <IHussain@infinera.com>
To: "<irs-discuss@ietf.org>" <irs-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [irs-discuss] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-amante-irs-topology-use-cases-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNoWAVFV7fWENG8EC+qoYcmocQLJeuaUgg
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 22:00:14 +0000
Message-ID: <D7D7AB44C06A2440B716F1F1F5E70AE53F9833F7@SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera.com>
References: <20121002221835.25341.54971.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4C43CAD2-093B-4795-8CB9-3A713B914B44@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <4C43CAD2-093B-4795-8CB9-3A713B914B44@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.100.96.93]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D7D7AB44C06A2440B716F1F1F5E70AE53F9833F7SVEXDBPROD1infi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-amante-irs-topology-use-cases-00.txt
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 22:00:17 -0000

Hi Authors,
"...and visible within the Link State Database (LSDB) of an active IGP, but also network elements who are active, but invisible to a LSDB (e.g.: L2 Ethernet switches, ROADM's, etc.)"
Shouldn't ROADMs topology be visible to IGP? Perhaps you intend to say optical line amplifier (OLA).
Regards,
Iftekhar