[irs-discuss] What's in a name?

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 12 November 2012 14:50 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220D221F85A2 for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 06:50:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.299
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.300, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wgGa37iBHVfB for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 06:50:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (asmtp1.iomartmail.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ABB021F854C for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 06:49:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain []) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qACEnst9004537 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:49:54 GMT
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com []) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qACEnr9n004519 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:49:54 GMT
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <irs-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:49:56 -0000
Message-ID: <015701cdc0e4$fbc439f0$f34cadd0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac3A5PsIVqU8XiJmRGOy8kKrHtrEtQ==
Content-Language: en-gb
Subject: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:50:04 -0000

Personally, I find discussions of what name/acronym to use a bit sad. I've had
enough code review hours wasted debating the names of variables to not want to
spend any more time on this sort of thing.

However, I note that there was some unease about the use of IRS. If we really
need to find a new name for this work (and I note that RSI is also used for
something else) we need to find a solution soon.

Can I suggest that only those people who have a strong objection to IRS need to
contribute to the discussion. Furthermore, we don't need suggestions to be
floated, we need solid and definite proposals. That way we will possibly reach a
serious conclusion quickly.