Re: [irs-discuss] An idea ... MTR + IRS

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 08 August 2012 10:10 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5F121F8501 for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 03:10:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.569
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PZ4zquL2OvyJ for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 03:10:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1310.opentransfer.com (mail1310.opentransfer.com [76.162.254.103]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1EEE21F84FE for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 03:10:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 6440 invoked by uid 399); 8 Aug 2012 10:11:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.91?) (pbs:robert@raszuk.net@83.31.225.201) by mail1310.opentransfer.com with ESMTPM; 8 Aug 2012 10:11:47 -0000
X-Originating-IP: 83.31.225.201
Message-ID: <50223B25.9080401@raszuk.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 12:10:45 +0200
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Edward Crabbe <edc@google.com>
References: <501B150C.9080304@raszuk.net> <CACKN6JFMxAiF63XPyUtGxE85iA1WpCe9S_y=yB684HA=57OsgQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACKN6JFMxAiF63XPyUtGxE85iA1WpCe9S_y=yB684HA=57OsgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "irs-discuss@ietf.org" <irs-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] An idea ... MTR + IRS
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert@raszuk.net
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 10:10:49 -0000

Ed,

 > If topo information export is in scope (which I believe it is) and
 > PBR route injection with nh recursion to rib (and thus connected
 > routes) is in scope (which I'm quite sure it is) then yes, this is in
 > scope.

Great !

> Although I'm not sure what it has to do with OF /OF controllers? ;P

One could observe that entire OF can be very easily mapped to well 
implemented and scaable PBR ;)

Best,
R.