[irs-discuss] draft-ward-irs-framework
Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> Sun, 29 July 2012 16:40 UTC
Return-Path: <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68E021F85C2 for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 09:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vnJTbrJZHg5a for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 09:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lucidvision.com (lucidvision.com [72.71.250.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA3E21F8504 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 09:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lucidvision.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C41632200A5B for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 12:39:59 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at www.lucidvision.com
Received: from lucidvision.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (static-72-71-250-34.cncdnh.fios.verizon.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dLsR6vnFnaQk for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 12:39:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [172.30.1.206] (c-98-247-226-85.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [98.247.226.85]) by lucidvision.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2892200A58 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 12:39:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <17897894-CD09-482F-9F1A-F01CF44DC906@lucidvision.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 09:39:57 -0700
To: irs-discuss@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1485\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1485)
Subject: [irs-discuss] draft-ward-irs-framework
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:40:07 -0000
We wanted to kick off the discussion here about the framework draft. What do you think? How can this be improved? Are we on the right track? The (proposed) Framework can be found here: http://lucidvision.com/draft-ward-irs-framework-00.txt We will be sending out a problem statement draft later today as well. --Tom, Alia, Ward
- [irs-discuss] draft-ward-irs-framework Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [irs-discuss] draft-ward-irs-framework Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [irs-discuss] draft-ward-irs-framework Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] draft-ward-irs-framework Joel M. Halpern