IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [irs-discuss] IRS Problem Statement Posted

<Manuel.Paul@telekom.de> Mon, 30 July 2012 23:31 UTC

Return-Path: <Manuel.Paul@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 412BB11E80BA for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vLQZJ54Dbfiu for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tcmail83.telekom.de (tcmail83.telekom.de [62.225.183.131]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747BC11E809A for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from he111527.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.125.90.86]) by tcmail81.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 31 Jul 2012 01:31:47 +0200
Received: from HE101452.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.125.92.148]) by HE111527.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM ([2002:7cd:5a56::7cd:5a56]) with mapi; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 01:31:47 +0200
From: Manuel.Paul@telekom.de
To: tnadeau@juniper.net, irs-discuss@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 01:31:44 +0200
Thread-Topic: IRS Problem Statement Posted
Thread-Index: Ac1uf6vUr0RoAYPERve+GHr5XPQ6JgAK504g
Message-ID: <9435EDACD941174099E143BCA2BCD615FAC450C3D3@HE101452.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
References: <CC3C1DEF.28D6%tnadeau@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <CC3C1DEF.28D6%tnadeau@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: de-DE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] IRS Problem Statement Posted
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:31:50 -0000

Hi,

How much of this is intended (or not) to actually represent a use case for Software-Defined Networking, i.e. become part of the application space for a North-Bound Interface?


Thanks,
Manuel


> -----Original Message-----
> From: irs-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:irs-discuss-bounces@ietf.org]
> On Behalf Of Thomas Nadeau
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 11:18 AM
> To: irs-discuss@ietf.org
> Subject: [irs-discuss] IRS Problem Statement Posted
>
>
>
> Please review and discuss.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tom, Alia, Ward
>
>
> http://lucidvision.com/draft-atlas-irs-problem-statement-00.txt
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> irs-discuss mailing list
> irs-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email