Re: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?

Sriganesh Kini <sriganesh.kini@ericsson.com> Mon, 12 November 2012 18:55 UTC

Return-Path: <sriganeshkini@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F5B21F868D for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:55:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FW3Eu8ekwrNk for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:55:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A6821F8686 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:55:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id u46so3264392wey.31 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:55:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=PWLP/jNAXnY0NH6XbHOTt2b/qsfWW4eJSxgLYuXVeBU=; b=G8SQaHxllTduwV8G+CXzBpe55SkvvVJbois+lzhaLQWlPSt8pYwJ1Nzqftr+T2mY6o YYkB9w0PqU/B4h7IlGu9NPKTRO1qIy+Ukm4vf+baTPxGqXaP93VHlf99jZiwSJYesZb0 lQp5QGj0boO/ZRY8uvSR47eGe/CSEQc9ap2zCXjJHk0vd5qAY3fU7Tf0ARX+ThlSoBWQ bEJGufTTUtED9FejbXtbTg9aI8EGnXRUdjzRWQj7H+68vxB3sd2qHL4E2S/XkBYyB9ja IfEAbGLfnukAb7sDcc4hVktJJAXlN3jfdyGlHIYfV/5QA2ypeDiY0uNJ0BopEBEZsLTK CycA==
Received: by 10.180.76.203 with SMTP id m11mr16542104wiw.6.1352746538420; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:55:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: sriganeshkini@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.43.170 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:55:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <015701cdc0e4$fbc439f0$f34cadd0$@olddog.co.uk>
References: <015701cdc0e4$fbc439f0$f34cadd0$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Sriganesh Kini <sriganesh.kini@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:55:08 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: J8_GP9nuQ6Gl7a-p69OJWgwq3go
Message-ID: <CAOndX-uiOo4cO3t6wym1SECSs7YTByAWWu9=ZVBLbLjMArnVjA@mail.gmail.com>
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c7b14e4ca7704ce50d820
Cc: irs-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:55:40 -0000

PRI - Programmatic Routing Interface

Though this clashes with PRI of ISDN fame that has long been buried. IRS,
besides the obvious clash can mess up the search results. Also, I don't see
a good reason to include 'System' in the acronym.


On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

> Personally, I find discussions of what name/acronym to use a bit sad. I've
> had
> enough code review hours wasted debating the names of variables to not
> want to
> spend any more time on this sort of thing.
>
> However, I note that there was some unease about the use of IRS. If we
> really
> need to find a new name for this work (and I note that RSI is also used for
> something else) we need to find a solution soon.
>
> Can I suggest that only those people who have a strong objection to IRS
> need to
> contribute to the discussion. Furthermore, we don't need suggestions to be
> floated, we need solid and definite proposals. That way we will possibly
> reach a
> serious conclusion quickly.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
> _______________________________________________
> irs-discuss mailing list
> irs-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss
>



-- 
- Sri