Re: [irs-discuss] Use Cases Draft First Cut

Aldrin Isaac <aldrin.isaac@gmail.com> Fri, 21 September 2012 17:30 UTC

Return-Path: <aldrin.isaac@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0C621E80BC for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.077, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vK2HcBZufFbc for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41EE21E80B9 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkty12 with SMTP id y12so1837268bkt.31 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=TWnUgHiUgKZWbA+4oVB2JsHWoKoqkoOqe91l+n+Qp1E=; b=EAQKLxa1LR/EHhBXNujn+N6xov2IXHpDI17TYrFWCgueRv6nwkC/ken06wbPMHt1Pv wMK8Q6Yw88n0mkE3Joy+ISCBnN/ffECqBEj2kL6FLPr1fDscbsa4dGx/avgqs7GMOZhj ev0tdh1bPjwSCT4eJNW5mnZciEmCiy8sPSYgljRenVSj6YZVwgz68pMfQZQ81dv6EmQR Xn4iy+hIkLshxDTxpV5d0aAjGGoavEYSJ0crlMgxJVYLHj4JR6W545tGZ8PxkXNRg9TB e2LJAxJ8aIu6He1r2bJI8zZoqGBZYPLHJQvSejnGannUsXsCg2qehcDBWhhaAH+lNIPK G4Uw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.5.144 with SMTP id 16mr2548329bkv.128.1348248639087; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.37.7 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOA2mbzArvqJg6roekPiG9-9SghnpwczVDr3g0OMYx-Ej6uFiA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5059CA9A.8040202@riw.us> <CADnDZ88jww9ZSgAC23pP=u05_yNn8yXbQYpcLoBe1n_YrbVUHQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOA2mbzArvqJg6roekPiG9-9SghnpwczVDr3g0OMYx-Ej6uFiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:30:39 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOA2mby_Y5XTuJsK90sqHKDpbGrhDBD91V12wnzA+jR_fVK+6A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Aldrin Isaac <aldrin.isaac@gmail.com>
To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Russ White <russw@riw.us>, irs-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] Use Cases Draft First Cut
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:30:43 -0000

Please ignore my last gmail blunder.

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Aldrin Isaac <aldrin.isaac@gmail.com> wrote:
> Lucy, could we organize the use cases draft in a manner similar to the
> presentation?  I.e. Use case categories under which would be use case
> requirements and their examples and associated discussion?
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Abdussalam Baryun
> <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Russ,
>>
>> The draft is interesting and IMO, I cannot give any feedback if there
>> are references but not shown. I suggest that at least [1-5] references
>> that you see is the most important for the draft to be given on the
>> list.
>>
>> AB
>> ----
>> On 9/19/12, Russ White <russw@riw.us> wrote:
>>> Y'all:
>>>
>>> Last night I published a new draft on use cases for IRS. Please read and
>>> send comments!
>>>
>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-white-irs-use-case/
>>>
>>> Several points to consider:
>>>
>>> 1. I've left all references out at the moment. I suspect this text is
>>> going to be changing a good bit; putting references in at this early of
>>> a stage invites reference mismatches through major text revisions.
>>>
>>> 2. I've left out a couple of suggested use cases. I think we need to
>>> focus on use cases that reach beyond currently available mechanisms, and
>>> show interaction between multiple pieces of an overall system.
>>>
>>> 3. I've worded some summary points in requirements language,
>>> specifically using SHOULD in a couple of places. We need to think about
>>> whether or not these types of references are "proper" in a use cases
>>> draft of this sort.
>>>
>>> 4. The text is probably still rough around the edges --I've focused more
>>> on the justification for the work in the introduction than on the actual
>>> text of the use cases. I'm certain the text in the actual use cases will
>>> harden as we get comments and edit those sections.
>>>
>>> Again, please read and make comments!
>>>
>>> Russ
>>>
>>> --
>>> <><
>>> riwhite@verisign.com
>>> russw@riw.us
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> irs-discuss mailing list
>>> irs-discuss@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> irs-discuss mailing list
>> irs-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss