Re: [irs-discuss] IRS Problem Statement Posted

Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@juniper.net> Tue, 31 July 2012 00:48 UTC

Return-Path: <tnadeau@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693B011E80BA for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 17:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.367
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.367 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.232, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k9XDZi2Q2rng for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 17:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og107.obsmtp.com (exprod7og107.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.167]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB8111E80BF for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 17:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob107.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUBcrTWGx7vCtXYPOo9I5ipPdUXsTV+PF@postini.com; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 17:48:21 PDT
Received: from p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.24) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 17:48:13 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::d0d1:653d:5b91:a123%11]) with mapi; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:48:12 -0400
From: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@juniper.net>
To: "Manuel.Paul@telekom.de" <Manuel.Paul@telekom.de>, "irs-discuss@ietf.org" <irs-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:48:06 -0400
Thread-Topic: IRS Problem Statement Posted
Thread-Index: Ac1utij8zW11RAG2R+WHrJNSw+vmcA==
Message-ID: <CC3C7936.298C%tnadeau@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <9435EDACD941174099E143BCA2BCD615FAC450C3D3@HE101452.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] IRS Problem Statement Posted
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:48:22 -0000

	The problem statement/framework are pretty clear that the intent is to
talk directly to the routing system. What happens below that is not part
of the problem we are trying to solve at the moment.

	--Tom



On 7/30/12 4:31 PM, "Manuel.Paul@telekom.de"; <Manuel.Paul@telekom.de>;
wrote:

>Hi,
>
>How much of this is intended (or not) to actually represent a use case
>for Software-Defined Networking, i.e. become part of the application
>space for a North-Bound Interface?
>
>
>Thanks,
>Manuel
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: irs-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:irs-discuss-bounces@ietf.org]
>> On Behalf Of Thomas Nadeau
>> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 11:18 AM
>> To: irs-discuss@ietf.org
>> Subject: [irs-discuss] IRS Problem Statement Posted
>>
>>
>>
>> Please review and discuss.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tom, Alia, Ward
>>
>>
>> http://lucidvision.com/draft-atlas-irs-problem-statement-00.txt
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> irs-discuss mailing list
>> irs-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss