Re: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?

Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com> Tue, 13 November 2012 03:48 UTC

Return-Path: <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5348221F8884 for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:48:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1A-Zc3o5byYw for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:48:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imr3.ericy.com (imr3.ericy.com [198.24.6.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97E921F84D5 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:48:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eusaamw0712.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.181]) by imr3.ericy.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qAD3mgip029529 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:48:42 -0600
Received: from EUSAAHC006.ericsson.se (147.117.188.90) by eusaamw0712.eamcs.ericsson.se (147.117.20.181) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.279.1; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 22:48:41 -0500
Received: from EUSAAMB109.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.126]) by EUSAAHC006.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.90]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 22:48:41 -0500
From: Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>
To: "Senad.palislamovic" <senad.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?
Thread-Index: Ac3A5PsIVqU8XiJmRGOy8kKrHtrEtQAAkBWdACGAOID//8kRXw==
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 03:48:40 +0000
Message-ID: <B7CA6248-9C78-4F59-86D7-EEEB72FB087A@ericsson.com>
References: <015701cdc0e4$fbc439f0$f34cadd0$@olddog.co.uk> <2835D71F-AEAE-49B3-8805-99F129C3F168@juniper.net>, <6D21D337-2DE8-423D-8908-4A498438830D@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6D21D337-2DE8-423D-8908-4A498438830D@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<adrian@olddog.co.uk>" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Raveendra Torvi <rtorvi@juniper.net>, "irs-discuss@ietf.org" <irs-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 03:48:47 -0000

Same here, I2IRS

Regards,
Jeff

On Nov 12, 2012, at 18:09, "Senad.palislamovic" <senad.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:

> +1 for I2RS
> 
> /senad
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Nov 12, 2012, at 7:06 AM, Raveendra Torvi <rtorvi@juniper.net>; wrote:
> 
>> My first set of suggestions:
>> 
>> I2RS- interface 2 routing system.
>> 
>> IRNE - interface to routing network element.
>> IRE - interface to routing element
>> INE - interface to network element.
>> APIRS - API to RS.
>> APIRE
>> 
>> Ravi 
>> On Nov 12, 2012, at 9:56 AM, "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; wrote:
>> 
>>> Personally, I find discussions of what name/acronym to use a bit sad. I've had
>>> enough code review hours wasted debating the names of variables to not want to
>>> spend any more time on this sort of thing.
>>> 
>>> However, I note that there was some unease about the use of IRS. If we really
>>> need to find a new name for this work (and I note that RSI is also used for
>>> something else) we need to find a solution soon.
>>> 
>>> Can I suggest that only those people who have a strong objection to IRS need to
>>> contribute to the discussion. Furthermore, we don't need suggestions to be
>>> floated, we need solid and definite proposals. That way we will possibly reach a
>>> serious conclusion quickly.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Adrian
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> irs-discuss mailing list
>>> irs-discuss@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> irs-discuss mailing list
>> irs-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> irs-discuss mailing list
> irs-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss