Re: [irs-discuss] Use Cases Draft First Cut

Aldrin Isaac <aldrin.isaac@gmail.com> Fri, 21 September 2012 17:29 UTC

Return-Path: <aldrin.isaac@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D596421F875C for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.092, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nOvtlX0oQZjr for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEACA21F84FA for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkty12 with SMTP id y12so1836803bkt.31 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=lCgr2haM2i2Kdg4AXqyYX05zP/ZykkbIkBs+v35wuR0=; b=BmsLNY3rg+cxG7qUbANoGNumZ2EcM3GBylp46eV5uSE4zts9g8S10n1TUMVhKxMaCD kfBeiSehZianATtZ0L82x3+u17klQL/AzgcwYne8mwL9gOWlh5alALCjT/eG9uRDtyow gCp4BkYV9n1wq2/q4ZIpqTinVTggtemj4nnVX47VDN42OtlrsHfbTiataTM2r5kMXtxl Wz/SMfhV59sQXt86Tn34MocyHMJlVVPXBuJmXZIOJ+vpak3mmRl4WkQBAdMU6GE4n80o yeYUMwoGdupUY+/gSuHVnt/h0fhmIa0wiKx/ehK7uZTtPSHFfHUGD06O+YbxUDsSxTRu 5TpA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.147.1 with SMTP id j1mr2574646bkv.110.1348248574760; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.37.7 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ88jww9ZSgAC23pP=u05_yNn8yXbQYpcLoBe1n_YrbVUHQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5059CA9A.8040202@riw.us> <CADnDZ88jww9ZSgAC23pP=u05_yNn8yXbQYpcLoBe1n_YrbVUHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:29:34 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOA2mbzArvqJg6roekPiG9-9SghnpwczVDr3g0OMYx-Ej6uFiA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Aldrin Isaac <aldrin.isaac@gmail.com>
To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Russ White <russw@riw.us>, irs-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] Use Cases Draft First Cut
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:29:36 -0000

Lucy, could we organize the use cases draft in a manner similar to the
presentation?  I.e. Use case categories under which would be use case
requirements and their examples and associated discussion?

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Abdussalam Baryun
<abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Russ,
>
> The draft is interesting and IMO, I cannot give any feedback if there
> are references but not shown. I suggest that at least [1-5] references
> that you see is the most important for the draft to be given on the
> list.
>
> AB
> ----
> On 9/19/12, Russ White <russw@riw.us> wrote:
>> Y'all:
>>
>> Last night I published a new draft on use cases for IRS. Please read and
>> send comments!
>>
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-white-irs-use-case/
>>
>> Several points to consider:
>>
>> 1. I've left all references out at the moment. I suspect this text is
>> going to be changing a good bit; putting references in at this early of
>> a stage invites reference mismatches through major text revisions.
>>
>> 2. I've left out a couple of suggested use cases. I think we need to
>> focus on use cases that reach beyond currently available mechanisms, and
>> show interaction between multiple pieces of an overall system.
>>
>> 3. I've worded some summary points in requirements language,
>> specifically using SHOULD in a couple of places. We need to think about
>> whether or not these types of references are "proper" in a use cases
>> draft of this sort.
>>
>> 4. The text is probably still rough around the edges --I've focused more
>> on the justification for the work in the introduction than on the actual
>> text of the use cases. I'm certain the text in the actual use cases will
>> harden as we get comments and edit those sections.
>>
>> Again, please read and make comments!
>>
>> Russ
>>
>> --
>> <><
>> riwhite@verisign.com
>> russw@riw.us
>> _______________________________________________
>> irs-discuss mailing list
>> irs-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss
>>
> _______________________________________________
> irs-discuss mailing list
> irs-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss