Re: [irs-discuss] Rough Draft IRS Charter

I have to say I agree with Joel on this.

Also, an unrelated comment: do you/we want to scope what is meant by
"Topology"?  For example, is TE/resource information in or out of scope?
 What about LFIB?  TMF.DM-1 of draft-medved-irs-topology-requirements
has a long list, are any out of scope?

Lou

On 10/18/2012 2:12 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> It seems to me that the second paragraph of the description is 
> misleading and unfortunate.  The proposed interface is not inherently 
> any faster (or slower) than any other existing interface.  It may in 
> fact use existing protocols and mechanisms.  At the same time, the 
> stated goal is to expose information and models that are generalizations 
> or synthesized combinations of what the devices currently expose.  This 
> is unlikely to be meaningfully manipulated using the same paradigms that 
> operators currently use.
> 
> Would it still hang together if he paragraph were simply removed?
> 
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> On 10/18/2012 11:55 AM, Ross Callon wrote:
>> Attached (in Word format) is a very rough initial draft charter (for a
>> potential IRS WG) that the BOF chairs have been discussing with our
>> friendly sponsoring routing area AD.
>> Comments are welcome. We will be discussing the draft IRS WG charter in
>> Atlanta.
>> Thanks, Ross
>> (with input from Dave and Adrian)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> irs-discuss mailing list
>> irs-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss
>>
> _______________________________________________
> irs-discuss mailing list
> irs-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss
> 
> 
> 
> 