Re: [irs-discuss] Rough Draft IRS Charter

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Thu, 18 October 2012 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A0721F85F5 for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.186
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.186 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.079, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OEAtbpzXpkpT for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy8-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy8-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.22.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 58F4121F85DA for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 5706 invoked by uid 0); 18 Oct 2012 22:07:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by oproxy8.bluehost.com with SMTP; 18 Oct 2012 22:07:06 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=RL5TXUfSUTCXY74L3qzyBfUwwuGpcC0VZiQTLvHDQbk=; b=gk3TvlFCgnQhnZ9WClP58GeZhuGBaPuqlBsd8XvS/x9jYLBMvJimT4hV3N6mmXaPNDVSjrQwIodFzGBppkhnAGtP4M8a9TWOx/i50rSbZOcxnrUl/N5WcDrne++/XT7F;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:38935 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1TOyF8-0001zw-2r; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:07:06 -0600
Message-ID: <50807D84.6020909@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:07:00 -0400
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, "dward@cisco.com" <dward@cisco.com>
References: <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C7EC9FE484@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <50804686.2010708@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <50804686.2010708@joelhalpern.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Cc: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "irs-discuss@ietf.org" <irs-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] Rough Draft IRS Charter
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 22:07:29 -0000

I have to say I agree with Joel on this.

Also, an unrelated comment: do you/we want to scope what is meant by
"Topology"?  For example, is TE/resource information in or out of scope?
 What about LFIB?  TMF.DM-1 of draft-medved-irs-topology-requirements
has a long list, are any out of scope?

Lou

On 10/18/2012 2:12 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> It seems to me that the second paragraph of the description is 
> misleading and unfortunate.  The proposed interface is not inherently 
> any faster (or slower) than any other existing interface.  It may in 
> fact use existing protocols and mechanisms.  At the same time, the 
> stated goal is to expose information and models that are generalizations 
> or synthesized combinations of what the devices currently expose.  This 
> is unlikely to be meaningfully manipulated using the same paradigms that 
> operators currently use.
> 
> Would it still hang together if he paragraph were simply removed?
> 
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> On 10/18/2012 11:55 AM, Ross Callon wrote:
>> Attached (in Word format) is a very rough initial draft charter (for a
>> potential IRS WG) that the BOF chairs have been discussing with our
>> friendly sponsoring routing area AD.
>> Comments are welcome. We will be discussing the draft IRS WG charter in
>> Atlanta.
>> Thanks, Ross
>> (with input from Dave and Adrian)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> irs-discuss mailing list
>> irs-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss
>>
> _______________________________________________
> irs-discuss mailing list
> irs-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss
> 
> 
> 
>