[irs-discuss] Enough already [Was: What's in a name?]

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 13 November 2012 00:20 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB75221F852A for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:20:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gyforqJs6SQd for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:20:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2560821F8488 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:20:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qAD0KBt1011813 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 00:20:11 GMT
Received: from 950129200 ([31.121.158.242]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qAD0K7bo011796 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 00:20:10 GMT
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <irs-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 00:20:10 -0000
Message-ID: <02ba01cdc134$a64c2280$f2e46780$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02BB_01CDC134.A6534E70"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac3BNJrji9SsoW0QSdiZXmZZ5/MOvQ==
Content-Language: en-gb
Subject: [irs-discuss] Enough already [Was: What's in a name?]
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 00:20:15 -0000

I can't pretend I didn't know what was going to happen. I knew you would all
ignore my request for moderation.
 
I am swayed by the Google results (although I suspect Ed could fix it for us).
I hear the claim that we should name the work to allow future ocean boiling and
will *not* be swayed by it.
 
Given that an early name change is desirable, I will work with the Secretariat
to change the name to I2RS and let you know when it happens.
 
Thanks,
Adrian