IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [irtf-discuss] NSRG Archives

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Fri, 16 July 2021 08:08 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0C33A2C08 for <irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 01:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AcjCB98oS8Oo for <irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 01:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6161C3A2BE5 for <irtf-discuss@irtf.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 01:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [85.131.57.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24EB160031C; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:08:21 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1626422901; bh=ZotlVs3khPnFjzDeC3nHYpjDJ2D2v7ZDsDdSaAmnST0=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=EkN8/xitF81gf5pDJ1xk/KWB4/TOundP00m+0zgOwzJduBXNIZcuY8p8qzLWg3t9L KmMq2ZPVivccgztl9qQZn6hTE2hyA2d9TRebCia+ulQjZpBNfNVMstRkyW12fxI8Hj hdrPwFJk2dbqDDLq84XDwpc/x0/ysXCDynvKTiHI=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <AEF67270-8C40-4D7A-984F-192BCDF527A0@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C1B28522-45D8-4774-BFF1-7F7808FECFC5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:08:20 +0300
In-Reply-To: <e6806490-c420-20f9-8920-3eff8aaaa3cd@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Babakian <Andrew.Babakian@student.uts.edu.au>, "irtf-discuss@irtf.org" <irtf-discuss@irtf.org>, steve@shinkuro.com, smb@cs.columbia.edu, Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <SY4PR01MB6608F95E6F6A15E1C158456487129@SY4PR01MB6608.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com> <8EE29B7E-D570-4A57-BC5D-B5970897ACD9@eggert.org> <e6806490-c420-20f9-8920-3eff8aaaa3cd@gmail.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 24EB160031C.A34E7
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/irtf-discuss/1SIYIDz1DTmuQi9YIawCMOSnGn8>
Subject: Re: [irtf-discuss] NSRG Archives
X-BeenThere: irtf-discuss@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF general and new-work discussion list <irtf-discuss.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/irtf-discuss>, <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/irtf-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:irtf-discuss@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/irtf-discuss>, <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:08:37 -0000

Hi,

apologies that I missed this having been a closed RG.

On 2021-7-16, at 0:01, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have 122 messages that were sent to nsrg@stevecrocker.com in 1999-2004. Since it was an invitational group, I'm not sure what the ethics are of releasing them.

How many member did the NSRG have? I wonder if it would be feasible to contact them to ask about making the archives public?

(More generally, I think it would be useful if the records of such historic closed groups could be made available for posterity in some form.)

Thanks,
Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email