[irtf-discuss] Re: [E-impact] Re: [Green] Re: Re: Draft Charter for an IRTF Proposed Research Group: Sustainability and the Internet Research Group (SUSTAIN RG)

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Sat, 09 November 2024 13:15 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: e-impact@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: e-impact@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCEAC14F700; Sat, 9 Nov 2024 05:15:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZPdCR0KMsR57; Sat, 9 Nov 2024 05:15:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42f.google.com (mail-pf1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4055AC14F6B0; Sat, 9 Nov 2024 05:15:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-720cb6ac25aso2794937b3a.3; Sat, 09 Nov 2024 05:15:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1731158105; x=1731762905; darn=ietf.org; h=to:cc:date:message-id:subject:mime-version:from :content-transfer-encoding:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=XFZWVwe2ihlRlGf+/mKxQ8W1tJ5Pdgw6PeKPNFCOJF8=; b=YGo2wrUOBWa7wnDOnq006a4D9VGgPlNBoH2CmEVUvU9t3cq3exHWjn4oJIfZGdXdFP eKOt6MJgByJ59O5hFfa/12fYbm1IUvy39P7fPoEOfoNPdgyglNldPr2lBaWixvLnS/C0 oGu7yfxqX0/Gb1wIcqcOHq0YsOjd2zaypIt3ITa+NwBK1A79urRc5WxhVex+UTs4hkBY NNJbG7z//xXqKkCAVFJsQKXznbWSDY8gRgv9wO9qrqpi33qa9/5EddOdiwWRbHG5KgN/ JdDQ1SLezmGbvQT4D59hXTcLHfeL4g1JfEOet9vYmRzbmwPaYKv1iUaWYLkCkpxol8gx zmVA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1731158105; x=1731762905; h=to:cc:date:message-id:subject:mime-version:from :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XFZWVwe2ihlRlGf+/mKxQ8W1tJ5Pdgw6PeKPNFCOJF8=; b=rmxMukCRj9KyR/6MKMTZPGEa0l6LN5t9ochWq0ETkSmaOlErbuSd4rWHl+H/6lDb9t QcQI2Wrc1ti2Zx9E5zPkgcH4ZubjmwkVv3Gi61VHdLnlknoEQRZaXiMdi7p+SL1PNEyd h9LSbC9HC1ruu/ElenDyaQYep2Ow/VjLEObXi9yRuZuT1a9Y03LWjbd0sSOFtXkucM1S jWkuU9qU/0WkcDEsohHViMSvS7uy81LNVbnNHuRMAdsZM55uxS2Ws6elxdIVBhr4xu/o 8sQ3WyEz8b2UoQGUbwTe8l2jDgSWhs/GniW3GZ1gXvzqHu7ABBNiyBcWjFQeo3I9EmSv 98vw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWshZqc1pGGvro6/mQZtF4buiCZ/Y8uWAzI396nk30aKyGCUWVmIdXWAfoziCeq1x/eLbmvWezFwg==@ietf.org, AJvYcCXvGD6ycea6ssLUvmbWTKoIIjIWnvDbkXGUDY8BLudLR4YcG2QK93flTGfsxb1ZeIUMKrvOl+g=@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxqpBB63NOKOcO1qRtDfdKvHhAD1uRM1+HUZIq7SMFQlZOKsZvI 4S34GtazDGgWltcYwTDmH4GPUA95d1IUtTyLS3mwHprWRrWwdx6L
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGE9o+D3AWQm6DFe3J50MJlKN8EpJbk7CG+lSx/A1xO3JOfAU9M6WHxvt99y0Q9MjbE1yzHdQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:4325:b0:1d6:fb1b:d07a with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-1dc22b57f1dmr7143288637.31.1731158105442; Sat, 09 Nov 2024 05:15:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([172.58.27.122]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-724078a7d0fsm5512486b3a.72.2024.11.09.05.15.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Nov 2024 05:15:04 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-057663E8-8686-4C87-9E16-4A6504A830E3"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Message-Id: <4B2EC446-4333-45BD-B8B6-FC35DFA77472@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2024 14:14:52 +0100
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (21F90)
X-MailFrom: mjethanandani@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: max-recipients
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
Message-ID-Hash: FEHAA6NYOO27XYZRGP2OXEONBZWABNTS
X-Message-ID-Hash: FEHAA6NYOO27XYZRGP2OXEONBZWABNTS
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 09 Nov 2024 05:47:15 -0800
CC: Hesham ElBakoury <helbakoury@gmail.com>, "Ali Rezaki (Nokia)" <ali.rezaki@nokia.com>, Dan York <york@isoc.org>, E-Impact IETF <e-impact@ietf.org>, green@ietf.org, irtf-discuss@irtf.org, Eve Schooler at Gmail <eve.schooler@gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [irtf-discuss] Re: [E-impact] Re: [Green] Re: Re: Draft Charter for an IRTF Proposed Research Group: Sustainability and the Internet Research Group (SUSTAIN RG)
List-Id: IRTF general and new-work discussion list <irtf-discuss.irtf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/irtf-discuss/3QQH6qco83_yvv2SFtPEU2cBKIg>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/irtf-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:irtf-discuss-owner@irtf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:irtf-discuss@irtf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:irtf-discuss-join@irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:irtf-discuss-leave@irtf.org>

Hi Toerless,

I have to remind myself not to compose and send emails when one is sleep deprived :-)

What I meant to say was that GREEN is not considering carbon energy efficiency. Sorry for the confusion. It is considering energy efficiency metrics and optimising energy efficiency across the network. 

Cheers.

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com

> On Nov 9, 2024, at 11:08 AM, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
>> GREEN is not looking into energy efficiency today.
> 
> That is surprising to hear given the name of the WG. Sure, its is somewhat of a
> "build it and they will come" - "anything you can measure, folks can easier optimize it",
> but that certainly is a requirement for optimization, even if the optimization itself
> is not something GREEN could do.