Re: [irtf-discuss] [Icn-interest] Draft ICN RG Charter

Markus Hofmann <markus@mhof.com> Thu, 26 May 2011 10:59 UTC

Return-Path: <markus@mhof.com>
X-Original-To: irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE3DE06BF for <irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2011 03:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26TOIHaHq6oZ for <irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2011 03:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp116.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp116.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.116]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C043E0664 for <irtf-discuss@irtf.org>; Thu, 26 May 2011 03:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp41.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A821E2904B9; Thu, 26 May 2011 06:59:17 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: OK
Received: by smtp41.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: markus-AT-mhof.com) with ESMTPSA id 772812900EB; Thu, 26 May 2011 06:59:17 -0400 (EDT)
References: <DC91B532-727D-428C-889F-4669268D46BB@ericsson.com> <4DDBB0D7.5080006@mhof.com> <82AB329A76E2484D934BBCA77E9F524905B43F87@PALLENE.office.hd>
In-Reply-To: <82AB329A76E2484D934BBCA77E9F524905B43F87@PALLENE.office.hd>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8J3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <23000241-B5B1-4B5C-8F77-A96A19A63C06@mhof.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (8J3)
From: Markus Hofmann <markus@mhof.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 06:59:52 -0400
To: "icn-interest@listserv.netlab.nec.de" <icn-interest@listserv.netlab.nec.de>
Cc: "irtf-discuss@irtf.org" <irtf-discuss@irtf.org>, "icn-interest@listserv.netlab.nec.de" <icn-interest@listserv.netlab.nec.de>
Subject: Re: [irtf-discuss] [Icn-interest] Draft ICN RG Charter
X-BeenThere: irtf-discuss@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF general and new-work discussion list <irtf-discuss.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/irtf-discuss>, <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/irtf-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irtf-discuss@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/irtf-discuss>, <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 10:59:19 -0000

Dirk,

That's what I meant - include in the charter the preparation of a problem statement draft as a deliverable. Not to include the summary itself in the charter.

Thanks,
  Markus

On May 26, 2011, at 4:16 AM, Dirk Kutscher <Dirk.Kutscher@neclab.eu> wrote:

> Markus,
> 
>> What about including a summary of the expected benefits of ICN, i.e.
>> first describe the *problem* to be solved in *quantifiable* terms, then
>> describe the main concepts and continue on to the research challenges.
> 
> Thanks, good point.
> 
> I'd preferably do that in more detail, in a problem statement draft, but I agree that the charter should ideally provide at least a summary for that.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Dirk
> _______________________________________________
> Icn-interest mailing list
> Icn-interest@listserv.netlab.nec.de
> https://listserv.netlab.nec.de/mailman/listinfo/icn-interest