IETF Logo Mail Archive

[irtf-discuss] Update on "Challenges for the Internet Routing Infrastructure Introduced by Changes"

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 24 February 2021 10:00 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1753A1330; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 02:00:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eQhZEfT2tyrP; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 02:00:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B01203A1327; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 02:00:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 11OA0mKF005383; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:00:49 GMT
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D1D220D2; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:00:48 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C6F922056; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:00:48 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.112.199.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 11OA0jOf024806 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:00:46 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: irtf-discuss@irtf.org
Cc: draft-king-irtf-challenges-in-routing@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:59:56 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <045901d70a93$ec0ffce0$c42ff6a0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdcKkw4GV8TMM4dBRhO1BqxO5Vg48Q==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 87.112.199.121
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25942.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--8.164-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--8.164-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25942.003
X-TMASE-Result: 10--8.164500-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: eqEHf/FrZGuwHZ1ma7tfpn2PoiXxUAcX3yH4TlR596+di9144A9ObZhj 44rNETuJfnvf5V13fqPUyE0kTMGNbG3QJCSFyLelcI7vRACwF0L2kudi1D33EvFVB54dFLrTUos L3YCgWus+Zitq6KwYj98FqbsaJmLVKDBeXRKDj53PkG//aAoWCfZfafJjZZIJSX8n1Gj4wAGZiK kTLfbrW3B3uQBEqRGrRPJ3kNtrVYJQsilTGCZzpO32BymYF0CRQ37rdi3NWIf+9LofIdYpC+riO 5OuagNBdwAK1WCnbngEE2WBGwi7GNGOV/iQ6gAvelGHXZKLL2vg02I3oyGU8LXc/uvpBT1oNLWe rM/sMYLKQVPET9WbrtbaUt5jL7y3ZgHMdKWm4rpO8qlnOXFSz30tCKdnhB58vqq8s2MNhPAL4Kb F8qbADBQabjOuIvShC24oEZ6SpSkgbhiVsIMQKxik37ZmR90XsfoDahYYbnQ8z47YtzjCo4N+tg zI/fR+zw6ffaQ++DSXmU/FzSSM1Q==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/irtf-discuss/7rPoWoItVI07NSzn93o9MM_AhKk>
Subject: [irtf-discuss] Update on "Challenges for the Internet Routing Infrastructure Introduced by Changes"
X-BeenThere: irtf-discuss@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF general and new-work discussion list <irtf-discuss.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/irtf-discuss>, <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/irtf-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:irtf-discuss@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/irtf-discuss>, <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:01:00 -0000

Hi all,

We received some feedback (thanks) on draft-king-irtf-challenges-in-routing
and posted an update at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-king-irtf-challenges-in-routing/

To recap, the draft presents a brief survey of technologies related to IP
address semantic proposals and describes the challenges to the existing
routing system that they present. It then summarizes the opportunities for
research into new or modified routing protocols to make use of new address
semantics. It does not pass comment on the advisability or practicality of
any of the solutions.

The intention, therefore, is to try to get a broad view of the work that has
been done, is in hand, and needs to be done. The document is not attempting
a detailed technical analysis, and is not proposing technical solutions.

We would really appreciate comments, feedback, and pointers to related work.

Thanks,
Adrian (for the authors)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email