[irtf-discuss] Next steps discussing Routing Challenges of Semantic Addressing
Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 06 May 2021 09:49 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D9F3A1A95;
Thu, 6 May 2021 02:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id kmLwGISHnEjA; Thu, 6 May 2021 02:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66FE63A1A96;
Thu, 6 May 2021 02:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123])
by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 1469n7G7022526;
Thu, 6 May 2021 10:49:07 +0100
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C7C22251;
Thu, 6 May 2021 10:49:07 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224])
by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 674872224F;
Thu, 6 May 2021 10:49:07 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([195.166.134.94]) (authenticated bits=0)
by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 1469n6TC007646
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
Thu, 6 May 2021 10:49:06 +0100
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <irtf-discuss@irtf.org>, <routing-discussion@ietf.org>
Cc: <daniel@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 10:49:05 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <01ba01d7425d$0df6aa60$29e3ff20$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AddCXOGLOQw5w65xRA2rDngl5lxhkw==
X-Originating-IP: 195.166.134.94
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-26134.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--8.428-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--8.428-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-26134.007
X-TMASE-Result: 10--8.428100-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: i20fXLuMR8AcSvcSkOdxf5hPSbe4na5MpQH4ogtVQP07sEw6V/IotH+M
hSycY9dZyvG5chRUvlTWA4eA/hjj/5Z4tMs9PLWw9FQh3flUIh6hp756/rM6UkYza41dGqxSzTH
pCuv+QlQk17/IvnxdZ8wvzWS5PNYsy5EHBSHFyU0AjRSlC8RgmfaS52LUPfcSry4WsSHcLSeXFd
AFROBVDpYldKX9PkZgN5MqjzJzYQhBLt7zmn77LVCCVuPjoP0CS1Zx8ootYRevloAnGr4qhuY86
qN+YNggTDnP5CiayInyN6EyLJlUTQ7HLBm/HEYkUlu/qwZkdioTbU1KYGoQp+cKfAU4MfYscLji
Kdfvhjd61QyiplcULM8HofwqfuMCei/RSp93ru+20BbG4zmyXiD90uGV1T4d/2WiLjTtRn2jxYy
RBa/qJX3mXSdV7KK4kVrCU883ln5TptoDfp6JrMRB0bsfrpPIx1FPlNAAmcAO0ut9D9spd0yQP7
vAYzylusgNnM5DiVvItyGYMLnEWJ6oP1a0mRIj
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/irtf-discuss/N1wWwjqm10wrIk04NLvMpdLx8Lc>
Subject: [irtf-discuss] Next steps discussing Routing Challenges of Semantic
Addressing
X-BeenThere: irtf-discuss@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF general and new-work discussion list <irtf-discuss.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/irtf-discuss>,
<mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/irtf-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:irtf-discuss@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/irtf-discuss>,
<mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 09:49:17 -0000
Dear all, Back in March we posted an initial draft to open the discussion of research related to routing based on additional meaning assigned to IP addresses, and to routing based on fields other than the destination address field of an IP packet. That draft attracted some comments, and one thing was clear: we needed to split the draft into a survey of work that has happened / is happening, and a discussion of the challenges to routing together with the research question. So we have done this now (sorry it took so long) and have posted: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-king-irtf-semantic-routing-survey/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-king-irtf-challenges-in-routing/ These new drafts do not pick up all of the comments received (we focused on the split), but we hope to address the comments in new revisions soon. At the same time, we have set up a dedicated mailing list for discussion of "Semantic Addressing Routing and Hardware" (SARAH) at sarah@jiscmail.ac.uk. This is an academic, research-based community where we can discuss all aspects of the drafts, introduce our research to each other, and advertise related conference activity. You can subscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=SARAH. We hope the new list will help to focus discussion and avoid spamming existing mailing lists. Looking forward to hearing your opinions. Adrian and Dan
- [irtf-discuss] Next steps discussing Routing Chal… Adrian Farrel