[irtf-discuss] Resend with modified subject line : Request for information - Challenges in routing related to semantic addressing
Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 12 February 2021 10:54 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irtf-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED273A155D;
Fri, 12 Feb 2021 02:54:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.916
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.916 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAY_BE_FORGED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Qb0VamMJs-5P; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 02:54:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta5.iomartmail.com (mta5.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.155])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01A1D3A155C;
Fri, 12 Feb 2021 02:54:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124])
by mta5.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 11CAsSGg004617;
Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:54:28 GMT
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3782203D;
Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:54:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248])
by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFA6E2203A;
Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:54:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (80.98.162.213.dyn.plus.net [213.162.98.80] (may
be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)
by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 11CAsRO2005187
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:54:27 GMT
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <irtf-discuss@irtf.org>
Cc: <draft-king-irtf-challenges-in-routing@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:54:27 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <015501d7012d$6ee2ea80$4ca8bf80$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdcBLW2fpk5BNWqRQ9CUmJb0FloKrQ==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 213.162.98.80
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25942.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--3.444-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--3.444-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25942.003
X-TMASE-Result: 10--3.444100-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: dJ1i/fMD8ifBSrt3Of4m5jjNGpWCIvfT2rWnqd4fvlTB8fZdmGC6ENZd
sLW7DWre4bw3qGt9FmAGTYaVvyDiIVij6deKAnlvtFK2ZlPEzxFYzwa0NvmV0UyMkq5fGHu2O/Z
eDlAvVGcwTJa5k2Lzt5Cf9h/jcnLxOrjyIiA+BkDQfyKEYQc1RxeE9CZcy0jL6Mw4RnkAvRK07N
ZjL4jSnVaf6rCF6bWoJtooYYp0WIrXvsE3MPuDQmvDT+wC7pqFoae+ev6zOlIIPuuOlevAyvRir
IWuGUBWSF5DcT571uaSegU2K5g78FRbmG3NfxpHB89GKHo03nZfyEOCl82mTZsoi2XrUn/JjcFm
PipjlBsMyrfP9j+C1d934/rDAK3zCaXr04pRMJCfILukxO3TCu4rw4KcrVXsiBSK+NPjBRj+CZz
HutCtpDiFCBhECo3kQwGWGZofDCXMAYNXerqhvbtVgVzYqNeZ3MRICcmXd1ewn+PGVed3d2n3Ee
4z0B9SIp5Rs422B5N7VnB1kjR3X4ZYKEHoCBPn
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/irtf-discuss/TA1SSijfSRI9B7wepmb34zm0g6c>
Subject: [irtf-discuss] Resend with modified subject line : Request for
information - Challenges in routing related to semantic addressing
X-BeenThere: irtf-discuss@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF general and new-work discussion list <irtf-discuss.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/irtf-discuss>,
<mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/irtf-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:irtf-discuss@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/irtf-discuss>,
<mailto:irtf-discuss-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:54:33 -0000
Hi, Resending this email because we fell foul of a filter on the mailing list that is designed to reduce the traffic related to conferences. Best, Adrian -----Original Message----- From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sent: 12 February 2021 10:43 To: 'irtf-discuss@irtf.org' <irtf-discuss@irtf.org> Cc: 'draft-king-irtf-challenges-in-routing@ietf.org' <draft-king-irtf-challenges-in-routing@ietf.org> Hi IRTF, We have just posted "Challenges for the Internet Routing Infrastructure Introduced by Changes in Address Semantics" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-king-irtf-challenges-in-routing/). This is an attempt to survey the issues and existing research related to the impact on the routing system of the many and varied proposals to add semantics to IP (chiefly IPv6) addresses. Where we are unable to find existing research, we are trying to collect the research questions that we think need to be addressed [sic]. Obviously, this is just a -00 version of the draft and it has a long way to go both in terms of clarity and literature search. We would very much appreciate comments and thoughts. In particular, if you are aware of any ongoing or published research in the area of semantic addressing or the consequences in routing, we would like to hear about it. Response direct to the authors or on this list (until we're told it is not appropriate for this list 😉) Best, Adrian (for the authors)
- [irtf-discuss] Resend with modified subject line … Adrian Farrel